1.Easy
An ombudsman typically:
- AHears appeals from the highest court
- BProsecutes criminal offences committed by ministers and civil servants
- CInvestigates complaints of maladministration by public bodies
- DDrafts legislation for parliament
2.Easy
Individual ministerial responsibility means that a minister:
- AIs accountable to Parliament for their department and personal conduct
- BCan be removed from office by the courts
- CMust personally approve every decision of their department
- DIs personally liable to pay damages for errors made by their civil servants
3.Easy
In the UK, the head of government is:
- AThe Speaker of the House of Commons
- BThe Prime Minister
- CThe Lord Chancellor
- DThe monarch
4.Medium
Under Article 94 of the Dutch Constitution, Dutch courts:
- AApply statutes even if they conflict with treaties
- BDo not apply statutes that conflict with treaty provisions binding on everyone
- CMust refer all treaty questions to the Council of State
- DCan strike down statutes that conflict with the Constitution or with general principles
5.Medium
Ellen Street Estates v Minister of Health is cited for the principle that:
- AEarlier Acts always prevail over later Acts
- BParliament cannot bind its successors, and a later Act impliedly repeals an inconsistent earlier one
- CParliament can entrench an Act against later repeal by stating expressly that it may not be amended in future
- DCourts may refuse to apply a later Act
6.Medium
In Marbury v Madison (1803), the US Supreme Court established:
- AThe power of Congress to overrule decisions of the federal judiciary
- BThe power of courts to review the constitutionality of legislation
- CThe right to bear arms
- DThe President's veto power
7.Hard
In the Harmonisatiewet judgment (1989), the Dutch Supreme Court held that Article 120 of the Constitution:
- AApplies only to delegated legislation
- BWas overridden by the principle of legal certainty
- CAllows courts to strike down Acts that breach fundamental principles such as legal certainty
- DPrevents courts from reviewing Acts of Parliament against fundamental principles of law
8.Hard
The legitimate expectation doctrine protects individuals when:
- AA public body made a clear promise or established practice that it then seeks to depart from unfairly
- BA minister speaks in Parliament
- CA contract with the government exists and the public body later fails to perform its contractual obligations
- DAny person hopes for a favourable decision
Answer key
- 1. C · Investigates complaints of maladministration by public bodies
- 2. A · Is accountable to Parliament for their department and personal conduct
- 3. B · The Prime Minister
- 4. B · Do not apply statutes that conflict with treaty provisions binding on everyone
- 5. B · Parliament cannot bind its successors, and a later Act impliedly repeals an inconsistent earlier one
- 6. B · The power of courts to review the constitutionality of legislation
- 7. D · Prevents courts from reviewing Acts of Parliament against fundamental principles of law
- 8. A · A public body made a clear promise or established practice that it then seeks to depart from unfairly
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.