1.Easy
Under the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, the House of Lords can generally delay most public bills passed by the Commons for about:
- AOne year
- BOne week
- CFive years
- DAs long as it wishes
2.Easy
The European Convention on Human Rights was drawn up within:
- AThe European Union
- BThe United Nations
- CThe Council of Europe
- DNATO
3.Easy
The United Kingdom's constitution is best described as:
- AFully written in one document
- BCopied from the US constitution
- CLargely uncodified
- DSet out entirely in EU treaties
4.Medium
In Golder v UK, the European Court of Human Rights held that Article 6 includes:
- AA right to a jury trial
- BA right to free legal aid in all cases
- CA right of access to a court
- DA right to appeal to Strasbourg
5.Medium
In Lingens v Austria, the European Court of Human Rights held that politicians:
- AMust tolerate wider criticism than private individuals
- BHave no rights under Article 10
- CCannot sue for defamation at all
- DAre fully protected from any criticism
6.Medium
A chief constable is dismissed without being told the charges or given a chance to respond. In Ridge v Baldwin, the House of Lords held:
- AThe dismissal was valid, because the police had no contract
- BThe dismissal was valid, as it was an administrative decision
- COnly Parliament could review the decision
- DThe dismissal was void for breach of natural justice
7.Hard
In the Harmonisatiewet judgment (1989), the Dutch Supreme Court held that Article 120 of the Constitution:
- APrevents courts from reviewing Acts of Parliament against fundamental principles of law
- BWas overridden by the principle of legal certainty
- CApplies only to delegated legislation
- DAllows courts to strike down Acts that breach fundamental principles such as legal certainty
8.Hard
In R v Home Secretary, ex p Simms, Lord Hoffmann explained the "principle of legality" as meaning that:
- ACourts may strike down Acts that breach fundamental rights
- BMinisters may limit fundamental rights whenever it is in the public interest
- CGeneral words in a statute are presumed not to override fundamental rights
- DParliament cannot legislate against fundamental rights
Answer key
- 1. A · One year
- 2. C · The Council of Europe
- 3. C · Largely uncodified
- 4. C · A right of access to a court
- 5. A · Must tolerate wider criticism than private individuals
- 6. D · The dismissal was void for breach of natural justice
- 7. A · Prevents courts from reviewing Acts of Parliament against fundamental principles of law
- 8. C · General words in a statute are presumed not to override fundamental rights
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.