1.Easy
Judicial independence means that:
- AJudges decide cases free from pressure from government or other parties
- BJudges are elected by the public
- CJudges may set aside any statute they consider unjust or contrary to good policy
- DJudges cannot be bound by statute
2.Easy
The principle of legality in public law means that a public authority:
- AMust always be elected
- BCan act freely unless a statute expressly prohibits the particular action taken
- CNeeds a legal basis for its actions, especially when interfering with rights
- DCan ignore laws during weekends
3.Easy
An ombudsman typically:
- AProsecutes criminal offences committed by ministers and civil servants
- BInvestigates complaints of maladministration by public bodies
- CHears appeals from the highest court
- DDrafts legislation for parliament
4.Medium
Under British Oxygen v Minister of Technology, a public body that adopts a policy for exercising its discretion must:
- AHave the policy approved by Parliament
- BApply the policy rigidly in every case to ensure consistent treatment
- CMake no policy at all
- DStill be willing to listen to anyone with something new to say
5.Medium
Ellen Street Estates v Minister of Health is cited for the principle that:
- AEarlier Acts always prevail over later Acts
- BParliament can entrench an Act against later repeal by stating expressly that it may not be amended in future
- CCourts may refuse to apply a later Act
- DParliament cannot bind its successors, and a later Act impliedly repeals an inconsistent earlier one
6.Medium
In Soering v UK, the European Court of Human Rights held that extraditing a man to the US to face a possible death sentence would breach Article 3 because:
- AThe US is not a party to the Convention
- BOf the extreme conditions and long wait on death row
- CThe death penalty itself always amounts to torture under Article 3
- DHe would not receive a fair trial
7.Hard
In R v Home Secretary, ex p Simms, Lord Hoffmann explained the "principle of legality" as meaning that:
- AMinisters may limit fundamental rights whenever it is in the public interest
- BParliament cannot legislate against fundamental rights
- CGeneral words in a statute are presumed not to override fundamental rights
- DCourts may strike down Acts that breach fundamental rights
8.Hard
In the Case of Proclamations (1610), the court held that the King:
- ACould change any law by proclamation
- BCould not create new offences by proclamation
- CCould suspend Acts of Parliament
- DCould dismiss judges who disagreed
Answer key
- 1. A · Judges decide cases free from pressure from government or other parties
- 2. C · Needs a legal basis for its actions, especially when interfering with rights
- 3. B · Investigates complaints of maladministration by public bodies
- 4. D · Still be willing to listen to anyone with something new to say
- 5. D · Parliament cannot bind its successors, and a later Act impliedly repeals an inconsistent earlier one
- 6. B · Of the extreme conditions and long wait on death row
- 7. C · General words in a statute are presumed not to override fundamental rights
- 8. B · Could not create new offences by proclamation
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.