1.Easy
Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights prohibits discrimination:
- AIn the enjoyment of the other Convention rights
- BOnly by private employers
- COnly on grounds of nationality
- DIn every area of life, as a free-standing right
2.Easy
Under section 6 of the UK Human Rights Act 1998, it is unlawful for:
- AParliament to pass any Act limiting rights
- BA private person to breach any Convention right
- CA public authority to act incompatibly with Convention rights
- DCourts to apply Acts of Parliament
3.Easy
Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects:
- AFreedom of assembly
- BThe right to life
- CThe right to a fair trial
- DThe right to free elections
4.Medium
Under ECHR case law such as Sunday Times v UK, for a restriction to be "prescribed by law", the law must be:
- AAdequately accessible and foreseeable in its effects
- BApproved by a referendum
- CContained in a single written statute passed by parliament
- DOlder than the Convention
5.Medium
A chief constable is dismissed without being told the charges or given a chance to respond. In Ridge v Baldwin, the House of Lords held:
- AThe dismissal was void for breach of natural justice
- BThe dismissal was valid, because the police had no contract
- COnly Parliament could review the decision
- DThe dismissal was valid, as it was an administrative decision
6.Medium
In Marbury v Madison (1803), the US Supreme Court established:
- AThe President's veto power
- BThe power of courts to review the constitutionality of legislation
- CThe right to bear arms
- DThe power of Congress to overrule decisions of the federal judiciary
7.Hard
Soldiers shoot dead three suspected terrorists in Gibraltar. In McCann v UK, the European Court of Human Rights found a breach of Article 2 because:
- AThe UK had not ratified the Convention for Gibraltar
- BAny killing by state agents breaches Article 2
- CThe soldiers acted out of personal hatred
- DThe operation was not planned and controlled to minimise the use of lethal force
8.Hard
In Brown v Board of Education (1954), the US Supreme Court held that racial segregation in public schools:
- AWas a matter for each state alone
- BWas constitutional so long as the separate facilities were of equal quality
- CViolated only the First Amendment
- DViolated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Answer key
- 1. A · In the enjoyment of the other Convention rights
- 2. C · A public authority to act incompatibly with Convention rights
- 3. C · The right to a fair trial
- 4. A · Adequately accessible and foreseeable in its effects
- 5. A · The dismissal was void for breach of natural justice
- 6. B · The power of courts to review the constitutionality of legislation
- 7. D · The operation was not planned and controlled to minimise the use of lethal force
- 8. D · Violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.