1.Easy
A constitutional monarchy is one in which the monarch:
- AIs head of state but acts within constitutional limits, mostly on ministers' advice
- BIs elected by parliament every five years
- CHolds all legislative and executive power personally, and ministers merely advise on request
- DLeads the governing political party
2.Easy
A referendum is:
- AA decision of the constitutional court
- BA direct vote by the electorate on a particular question
- CAn election of members of parliament
- DA vote of no confidence in the government by members of parliament
3.Easy
The European Convention on Human Rights is enforced by:
- AThe European Parliament
- BThe International Court of Justice in The Hague
- CThe European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg
- DThe Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg
4.Medium
In Hirst v UK (No 2), the European Court of Human Rights held that the UK's blanket ban on voting by convicted prisoners:
- AViolated the right to free elections in Protocol 1, Article 3
- BWas justified because prisoners have no rights
- CViolated the right to freedom of expression in Article 10 of the Convention
- DWas within the UK's margin of appreciation
5.Medium
In Thoburn v Sunderland City Council (the "metric martyrs" case), Laws LJ said that "constitutional statutes":
- AMust be approved by referendum
- BPrevail automatically over all later Acts of Parliament
- CCannot be repealed at all
- DCannot be impliedly repealed, only expressly
6.Medium
A minister refuses to refer a complaint to a committee because the result might embarrass the government. In Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, the House of Lords held:
- AThe refusal was unlawful, as it frustrated the purpose of the Act
- BThe minister had unlimited discretion
- CThe refusal was lawful, since the Act imposed no duty to give reasons
- DOnly Parliament could question the minister
7.Hard
Since the 2008 constitutional reform in France, the "question prioritaire de constitutionnalité" allows:
- AA party in court to ask for a statute in force to be reviewed for breach of constitutional rights
- BAny citizen to challenge a bill before Parliament votes on it, by petition to the Conseil constitutionnel
- CJudges in any court to strike down statutes themselves
- DThe President to suspend a statute for one year
8.Hard
In the Case of Proclamations (1610), the court held that the King:
- ACould change any law by proclamation
- BCould suspend Acts of Parliament
- CCould dismiss judges who disagreed
- DCould not create new offences by proclamation
Answer key
- 1. A · Is head of state but acts within constitutional limits, mostly on ministers' advice
- 2. B · A direct vote by the electorate on a particular question
- 3. C · The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg
- 4. A · Violated the right to free elections in Protocol 1, Article 3
- 5. D · Cannot be impliedly repealed, only expressly
- 6. A · The refusal was unlawful, as it frustrated the purpose of the Act
- 7. A · A party in court to ask for a statute in force to be reviewed for breach of constitutional rights
- 8. D · Could not create new offences by proclamation
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.