1.Easy
The European Convention on Human Rights is enforced by:
- AThe European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg
- BThe Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg
- CThe European Parliament
- DThe International Court of Justice in The Hague
2.Easy
Under section 19 of the UK Human Rights Act 1998, the minister in charge of a bill must:
- AMake a statement about whether it is compatible with Convention rights
- BHold a public consultation on it
- CObtain the Supreme Court's approval of its compatibility before second reading
- DSend it to the European Court of Human Rights
3.Easy
A "rigid" constitution is one that:
- ACan never be amended at all
- BCan be amended only by a special procedure
- CIs enforced strictly by the army
- DCan be changed by an ordinary Act
4.Medium
In Dudgeon v UK, the European Court of Human Rights held that criminalising consensual homosexual acts between adult men in Northern Ireland:
- AWas justified under Article 8(2) as necessary to protect public morals
- BViolated only the right to marry
- CWas outside the scope of the Convention
- DViolated the right to respect for private life under Article 8
5.Medium
In the GCHQ case, the House of Lords held that the exercise of prerogative powers:
- AIs always fully reviewable, whatever subject matter it concerns
- BCan be reviewed only if Parliament agrees
- CCan be judicially reviewed, depending on its subject matter
- DCan never be reviewed by the courts
6.Medium
Under British Oxygen v Minister of Technology, a public body that adopts a policy for exercising its discretion must:
- AApply the policy rigidly in every case to ensure consistent treatment
- BHave the policy approved by Parliament
- CMake no policy at all
- DStill be willing to listen to anyone with something new to say
7.Hard
Under Osman v UK, a state breaches its positive obligation under Article 2 to protect a person from a third party if the authorities:
- AFailed to convict the person who later killed the victim
- BDid not provide round-the-clock police protection for every person who had reported any threat against them
- CFailed to prevent any crime in their area
- DKnew or ought to have known of a real and immediate risk to life, and failed to take reasonable measures
8.Hard
In R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU (2017), the UK Supreme Court held that:
- AThe government could give notice using prerogative powers without any Act of Parliament
- BThe referendum result was legally binding
- CDevolved legislatures had a veto over Brexit
- DParliamentary legislation was required to give notice of withdrawal from the EU
Answer key
- 1. A · The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg
- 2. A · Make a statement about whether it is compatible with Convention rights
- 3. B · Can be amended only by a special procedure
- 4. D · Violated the right to respect for private life under Article 8
- 5. C · Can be judicially reviewed, depending on its subject matter
- 6. D · Still be willing to listen to anyone with something new to say
- 7. D · Knew or ought to have known of a real and immediate risk to life, and failed to take reasonable measures
- 8. D · Parliamentary legislation was required to give notice of withdrawal from the EU
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.