1.Easy
Which Act created the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom?
- AConstitutional Reform Act 2005
- BParliament Act 1911
- CHuman Rights Act 1998
- DScotland Act 1998
2.Easy
The separation of powers divides state power between:
- AThe central, regional and local tiers of government
- BThe police, the army and the courts
- CParliament, the monarch and the church
- DThe legislature, the executive and the judiciary
3.Easy
Devolution in the UK means that:
- AThe UK has become a federal state in which the regional powers are entrenched and cannot be removed by Westminster
- BLocal councils can override Acts of Parliament
- CParliament transfers some powers to bodies in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland while remaining sovereign
- DThe monarch shares power with regional parliaments
4.Medium
In Soering v UK, the European Court of Human Rights held that extraditing a man to the US to face a possible death sentence would breach Article 3 because:
- AHe would not receive a fair trial
- BThe death penalty itself always amounts to torture under Article 3
- COf the extreme conditions and long wait on death row
- DThe US is not a party to the Convention
5.Medium
Under ECHR case law such as Sunday Times v UK, for a restriction to be "prescribed by law", the law must be:
- AOlder than the Convention
- BAdequately accessible and foreseeable in its effects
- CContained in a single written statute passed by parliament
- DApproved by a referendum
6.Medium
Proportionality review usually asks whether a measure:
- AIs popular with voters
- BIs the cheapest option available and has been approved by parliament
- CWas adopted quickly
- DPursues a legitimate aim, is suitable, necessary and balanced
7.Hard
In Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke, the Privy Council held that the UK Parliament could still legislate for Southern Rhodesia because:
- ARhodesia had consented to the legislation
- BThe convention was legally binding but had been waived by Rhodesia
- CA convention that it would not do so did not limit its legal power
- DRhodesia had become fully independent
8.Hard
Officers enter a writer's house and seize his papers under a warrant issued by a Secretary of State with no legal authority to issue it. In Entick v Carrington, the court held:
- AThe search was unlawful, because state action needs legal authority
- BThe writer could only complain to Parliament
- CThe search was lawful, because the warrant was signed
- DThe search was lawful, because state necessity justified seizing the papers
Answer key
- 1. A · Constitutional Reform Act 2005
- 2. D · The legislature, the executive and the judiciary
- 3. C · Parliament transfers some powers to bodies in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland while remaining sovereign
- 4. C · Of the extreme conditions and long wait on death row
- 5. B · Adequately accessible and foreseeable in its effects
- 6. D · Pursues a legitimate aim, is suitable, necessary and balanced
- 7. C · A convention that it would not do so did not limit its legal power
- 8. A · The search was unlawful, because state action needs legal authority
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.