1.Easy
Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights prohibits discrimination:
- AIn every area of life, as a free-standing right
- BOnly on grounds of nationality
- CIn the enjoyment of the other Convention rights
- DOnly by private employers
2.Easy
The principle of legality in public law means that a public authority:
- AMust always be elected
- BCan ignore laws during weekends
- CNeeds a legal basis for its actions, especially when interfering with rights
- DCan act freely unless a statute expressly prohibits the particular action taken
3.Easy
Which right is protected by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights?
- ARight to life
- BRight to marry
- CFreedom of expression
- DProhibition of torture
4.Medium
Under British Oxygen v Minister of Technology, a public body that adopts a policy for exercising its discretion must:
- AMake no policy at all
- BHave the policy approved by Parliament
- CApply the policy rigidly in every case to ensure consistent treatment
- DStill be willing to listen to anyone with something new to say
5.Medium
In Soering v UK, the European Court of Human Rights held that extraditing a man to the US to face a possible death sentence would breach Article 3 because:
- AHe would not receive a fair trial
- BThe US is not a party to the Convention
- COf the extreme conditions and long wait on death row
- DThe death penalty itself always amounts to torture under Article 3
6.Medium
Constitutional conventions are:
- AWritten rules found in statutes that courts enforce like any other law
- BNon-legal rules of political practice that are regarded as binding
- CMeetings held to write a new constitution
- DInternational treaties about the constitution
7.Hard
A tribunal orders publication of Prince Charles's letters to ministers. The Attorney General issues a certificate under the Freedom of Information Act overriding it. In R (Evans) v Attorney General (2015), the Supreme Court held:
- AThe certificate was invalid, as he had merely disagreed with the tribunal's view of the same facts
- BThe certificate was valid, as the Act gave him an unqualified veto over any tribunal decision on disclosure
- CThe letters could never be published
- DThe Act was incompatible with Article 10 ECHR
8.Hard
The government introduces high fees for bringing claims to employment tribunals, and the number of claims falls sharply. In R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor (2017), the Supreme Court held:
- AThe fees were lawful because Parliament authorised fees
- BThe fees were unlawful because they prevented access to justice
- CThe fees were lawful because users of the courts must pay for them
- DThe fees breached only EU competition law
Answer key
- 1. C · In the enjoyment of the other Convention rights
- 2. C · Needs a legal basis for its actions, especially when interfering with rights
- 3. C · Freedom of expression
- 4. D · Still be willing to listen to anyone with something new to say
- 5. C · Of the extreme conditions and long wait on death row
- 6. B · Non-legal rules of political practice that are regarded as binding
- 7. A · The certificate was invalid, as he had merely disagreed with the tribunal's view of the same facts
- 8. B · The fees were unlawful because they prevented access to justice
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.