1.Easy
The rule that consideration "must be sufficient but need not be adequate" means:
- AIt must have some value in law, but need not match the value of the promise
- BIt must be equal to the market value of the promise it is given in exchange for
- CIt must always be paid in money
- DIt must be paid before the contract is made
2.Easy
In English law, a promise made in a deed is enforceable even without:
- AA signature
- BDelivery of the deed
- CWriting
- DConsideration
3.Easy
Rescission of a contract means:
- ASetting the contract aside so the parties return to their original positions
- BOrdering a party to perform as promised
- CEnding the contract for the future only and claiming damages for lost profits
- DCorrecting the wording of a written contract
4.Medium
What is consideration in common law contracts?
- AThe intention to create legal relations shown by both parties
- BThe written form of a contract
- CSomething of value given in exchange for a promise
- DCareful thought before signing
5.Medium
Sailors are promised extra wages for sailing a ship home after two crew members desert, but they do no more than their contract already required. In Stilk v Myrick the promise was:
- AEnforceable because the captain agreed freely
- BEnforceable as a practical benefit
- CUnenforceable for lack of consideration
- DUnenforceable because it was made at sea
6.Medium
In English law, the "postal rule" means an acceptance sent by post takes effect:
- AWhen the letter arrives
- BWhen the letter is read
- CWhen the offeror replies
- DWhen the letter is posted
7.Hard
A council writes that it "may be prepared to sell" a house to a tenant and invites a formal application. The tenant applies, then the council changes its policy. In Gibson v Manchester City Council, the House of Lords held:
- AThe council was bound by estoppel to sell
- BA contract was formed when the council's letter was sent to the tenant
- CThere was no contract, because the letter was not an offer
- DA contract was formed when the tenant applied
8.Hard
In Great Peace Shipping v Tsavliris Salvage, the Court of Appeal held that a contract is void for common mistake only if the mistake makes performance:
- ACommercially less attractive for one party
- BDifferent from the contract in a minor detail
- CImpossible or essentially different from what the parties agreed
- DMore expensive to carry out than both parties had expected when contracting
Answer key
- 1. A · It must have some value in law, but need not match the value of the promise
- 2. D · Consideration
- 3. A · Setting the contract aside so the parties return to their original positions
- 4. C · Something of value given in exchange for a promise
- 5. C · Unenforceable for lack of consideration
- 6. D · When the letter is posted
- 7. C · There was no contract, because the letter was not an offer
- 8. C · Impossible or essentially different from what the parties agreed
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.