1.Easy
A shop displays a jacket with a price tag in its window. In English law this is usually:
- AA binding offer to sell at that price
- BAn invitation to treat
- CA unilateral contract
- DAn acceptance
2.Easy
An offeree asks whether the offeror would accept delivery in two parts, without rejecting the original terms. This is:
- AA counter-offer
- BA revocation
- CAn acceptance
- DA request for information
3.Easy
The rule that consideration "must be sufficient but need not be adequate" means:
- AIt must be paid before the contract is made
- BIt must always be paid in money
- CIt must be equal to the market value of the promise it is given in exchange for
- DIt must have some value in law, but need not match the value of the promise
4.Medium
A holiday company provides a holiday far below the promised standard. Can the customer recover damages for disappointment?
- AOnly if the customer suffered a physical injury
- BYes, because the contract's purpose was to provide enjoyment
- COnly if the company acted dishonestly
- DNo, because mental distress is never recoverable in contract
5.Medium
Damages for breach of contract are generally meant to:
- AGive the innocent party a profit beyond their loss
- BPut the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been performed
- CPunish the party in breach
- DReturn both parties only to the position they were in before the contract was made
6.Medium
A buyer is told false figures about a business and is offered documents that would reveal the truth, but does not read them. Under Redgrave v Hurd:
- AThe buyer can still rely on the misrepresentation
- BThe misrepresentation becomes a term
- CThe buyer loses all remedies by failing to check
- DThe buyer can claim only half the loss
7.Hard
A chartered ship is returned late, and the owner loses a very profitable follow-on charter. In The Achilleas, the House of Lords held the charterer was liable:
- AFor no loss, because late return is not a breach
- BFor the whole profit lost on the follow-on charter, as it was foreseeable
- CFor punitive damages, because the delay was deliberate
- DOnly for the market rate difference during the overrun period
8.Hard
A husband who has left his wife signs a note promising to transfer the house to her if she pays off the mortgage. She does. In Merritt v Merritt, the promise was:
- AEnforceable only because it was made by deed
- BUnenforceable, because it was a domestic arrangement between husband and wife
- CUnenforceable, because she gave no consideration
- DEnforceable, because separated spouses are presumed to intend legal relations
Answer key
- 1. B · An invitation to treat
- 2. D · A request for information
- 3. D · It must have some value in law, but need not match the value of the promise
- 4. B · Yes, because the contract's purpose was to provide enjoyment
- 5. B · Put the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been performed
- 6. A · The buyer can still rely on the misrepresentation
- 7. D · Only for the market rate difference during the overrun period
- 8. D · Enforceable, because separated spouses are presumed to intend legal relations
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.