1.Easy
A unilateral contract is one in which:
- AOnly one party is allowed to terminate it
- BOne party promises something in return for the other performing an act
- COnly one party signs the written document, so only that party is bound by it
- DThe terms are imposed by statute on one party
2.Easy
Which elements are generally needed to form a contract?
- AAn offer and an acceptance, with the intention to be legally bound
- BA written document signed by both parties and certified by a notary
- CA payment made in advance
- DA witness for each party
3.Easy
In England and Wales, a contract for the sale of land must be:
- AIn writing, containing all agreed terms, and signed by both parties
- BApproved by a court and registered with HM Land Registry before it is made
- CMade only through an estate agent
- DMade orally in front of two witnesses
4.Medium
An actor withdraws from a TV film and the company cannot prove what profit the film would have made. It may claim:
- APunitive damages to deter the actor
- BIts estimated profits from the film, even if they are purely speculative
- CIts wasted expenditure, including costs incurred before the contract
- DOnly nominal damages of a small sum
5.Medium
In English law, the "postal rule" means an acceptance sent by post takes effect:
- AWhen the letter is read
- BWhen the offeror replies
- CWhen the letter is posted
- DWhen the letter arrives
6.Medium
Damages for breach of contract are generally meant to:
- APunish the party in breach
- BPut the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been performed
- CReturn both parties only to the position they were in before the contract was made
- DGive the innocent party a profit beyond their loss
7.Hard
A carrier, knowing a small company depends on its deliveries to supply a major customer, refuses to continue unless paid a higher minimum price. The company agrees as it has no alternative. In Atlas Express v Kafco:
- AThe new agreement was binding, as the carrier's continued performance was a practical benefit
- BThe new agreement was not binding, due to economic duress
- CThe carrier committed a crime of extortion
- DThe new agreement was binding as a free variation
8.Hard
A rogue uses a stolen driving licence to take a car on written hire-purchase in another person's name. In Shogun Finance v Hudson, the majority of the House of Lords held:
- AThe contract was valid with the rogue himself
- BThe contract was void, because the finance company dealt only with the named person
- CThe contract was void, because hire-purchase agreements must always be made face to face
- DThe contract was voidable, so a later buyer got good title
Answer key
- 1. B · One party promises something in return for the other performing an act
- 2. A · An offer and an acceptance, with the intention to be legally bound
- 3. A · In writing, containing all agreed terms, and signed by both parties
- 4. C · Its wasted expenditure, including costs incurred before the contract
- 5. C · When the letter is posted
- 6. B · Put the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been performed
- 7. B · The new agreement was not binding, due to economic duress
- 8. B · The contract was void, because the finance company dealt only with the named person
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.