1.Easy
A shop displays a jacket with a price tag in its window. In English law this is usually:
- AA binding offer to sell at that price
- BAn acceptance
- CAn invitation to treat
- DA unilateral contract
2.Easy
In English law, agreements between spouses living together in harmony are presumed to be:
- ABinding only if witnessed
- BNot intended to be legally binding
- CBinding only for one year
- DAlways legally binding
3.Easy
What is a breach of contract?
- AFailing to perform a contractual obligation without a lawful excuse
- BWithdrawing an offer before it is accepted, after promising to keep it open
- CRefusing to sign a contract
- DNegotiating a better price
4.Medium
A contract made under duress may be:
- AAutomatically valid with no remedy
- BEnforced against the pressured party in every case
- CTurned into a criminal offence only
- DAvoided (set aside) by the pressured party
5.Medium
A seller of land never used for sheep says it could carry 2,000 sheep. Both know he has no experience of sheep farming on it. The statement is most likely:
- AAn honest opinion, not a misrepresentation
- BA fraudulent misrepresentation
- CA statement of future intention
- DA condition of the contract
6.Medium
An actress agrees to act only for one studio and not for any other during the contract. She leaves to act for a rival. The court is most likely to:
- ARefuse any remedy, as personal services are involved
- BGrant an injunction stopping her acting for the rival
- COrder her to perform her contract with the studio
- DOrder her to pay the rival's profits to the court
7.Hard
A former spy publishes his memoirs in breach of his undertaking not to disclose official information. In AG v Blake, the House of Lords:
- AOrdered him to account for his profits, in an exceptional case
- BAwarded punitive damages to the Crown
- CAwarded only nominal damages
- DHeld that no remedy was available
8.Hard
A van is bought "on hire-purchase terms" with no further detail, and such terms varied widely in practice. In Scammell v Ouston, the House of Lords held:
- AThere was a contract on the standard hire-purchase terms of the market
- BThe seller's usual terms applied
- CThere was a contract at a reasonable price
- DThere was no contract, because the terms were too vague
Answer key
- 1. C · An invitation to treat
- 2. B · Not intended to be legally binding
- 3. A · Failing to perform a contractual obligation without a lawful excuse
- 4. D · Avoided (set aside) by the pressured party
- 5. A · An honest opinion, not a misrepresentation
- 6. B · Grant an injunction stopping her acting for the rival
- 7. A · Ordered him to account for his profits, in an exceptional case
- 8. D · There was no contract, because the terms were too vague
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.