1.Easy
According to Derry v Peek, a misrepresentation is fraudulent if the maker:
- AMade a profit from the contract that followed
- BKnew it was false, did not believe it, or was reckless whether it was true
- CMade it carelessly and without checking the facts, though honestly believing it
- DMade it in a written document
2.Easy
Minors (under 18) entering contracts are generally:
- ANever able to make any contract
- BProtected, so many of their contracts are not enforceable against them
- CBound in exactly the same way as adults, unless their parents object in writing
- DLiable only if their parents sign too
3.Easy
An offer with no stated time limit lapses:
- AAfter exactly seven days
- BAt midnight on the day it is made
- CNever, unless revoked
- DAfter a reasonable time
4.Medium
A seller says the farms are "fully let" but does not mention that the tenants have given notice to leave. This is:
- AA mere puff with no legal effect
- BA misrepresentation by half-truth
- CA statement of opinion only
- DMere silence, which is never actionable
5.Medium
A builder makes a swimming pool shallower than agreed. It is still safe and no less valuable, and rebuilding would cost far more than any benefit. In Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth the owner received:
- AThe full cost of rebuilding the pool
- BA modest sum for loss of amenity
- CA full refund of the contract price
- DNothing, as there was no loss in value
6.Medium
Sailors are promised extra wages for sailing a ship home after two crew members desert, but they do no more than their contract already required. In Stilk v Myrick the promise was:
- AEnforceable as a practical benefit
- BUnenforceable for lack of consideration
- CUnenforceable because it was made at sea
- DEnforceable because the captain agreed freely
7.Hard
An actress is wrongly denied the chance to take part in the final stage of a competition in which some finalists would win prizes. In Chaplin v Hicks:
- AShe could recover nothing, because her loss was uncertain
- BShe could recover only her travel expenses
- CShe could recover the full value of a prize
- DShe could recover damages for the loss of a chance
8.Hard
In the Dutch Civil Code (BW), an offer that states a time limit for acceptance is:
- ARevocable at any moment before acceptance
- BAutomatically accepted at the end of the period
- CIrrevocable during that period
- DInvalid without notarial approval
Answer key
- 1. B · Knew it was false, did not believe it, or was reckless whether it was true
- 2. B · Protected, so many of their contracts are not enforceable against them
- 3. D · After a reasonable time
- 4. B · A misrepresentation by half-truth
- 5. B · A modest sum for loss of amenity
- 6. B · Unenforceable for lack of consideration
- 7. D · She could recover damages for the loss of a chance
- 8. C · Irrevocable during that period
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.