1.Easy
Under the UK Consumer Rights Act 2015, goods supplied by a trader to a consumer must be:
- ASold below the recommended retail price
- BCovered by a five-year manufacturer guarantee against all defects
- CBrand new and in their original packaging
- DOf satisfactory quality, fit for purpose and as described
2.Easy
In English law, revocation of an offer takes effect:
- AOnly after a reasonable notice period
- BWhen the letter of revocation is posted
- CAs soon as the offeror privately decides
- DWhen it is actually communicated to the offeree
3.Easy
An offer with no stated time limit lapses:
- ANever, unless revoked
- BAfter exactly seven days
- CAfter a reasonable time
- DAt midnight on the day it is made
4.Medium
A sailor is to be paid only on completing a voyage, but dies part of the way. Under the strict rule applied in Cutter v Powell:
- AA proportion of the wages was payable
- BThe ship owner had to pay compensation
- CThe full wages were payable
- DNothing was recoverable for the part performed
5.Medium
Promissory estoppel can prevent a party from:
- ASuing for any breach at all, including breaches entirely unrelated to the promise that it made
- BMaking any new promises
- CEntering into future contracts
- DGoing back on a promise not to enforce strict legal rights, when the other relied on it
6.Medium
A former wife sues for maintenance her ex-husband promised, relying only on promissory estoppel because she gave no consideration. In Combe v Combe:
- AShe succeeded, because she relied on the promise
- BShe failed, because promissory estoppel is a shield, not a sword
- CShe failed, because family agreements are never legally binding on either party
- DShe succeeded, because the promise was made in writing
7.Hard
A van is bought "on hire-purchase terms" with no further detail, and such terms varied widely in practice. In Scammell v Ouston, the House of Lords held:
- AThere was a contract on the standard hire-purchase terms of the market
- BThe seller's usual terms applied
- CThere was no contract, because the terms were too vague
- DThere was a contract at a reasonable price
8.Hard
A council invites tenders by a deadline. A club submits on time, but the council wrongly treats it as late and ignores it. In Blackpool and Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool BC, the Court of Appeal held:
- AThere was no obligation of any kind, as an invitation to tender is only an invitation to treat
- BThe council was obliged to accept the club's tender
- CThe council breached an implied contract to consider conforming tenders
- DThe club could only claim in tort for negligence
Answer key
- 1. D · Of satisfactory quality, fit for purpose and as described
- 2. D · When it is actually communicated to the offeree
- 3. C · After a reasonable time
- 4. D · Nothing was recoverable for the part performed
- 5. D · Going back on a promise not to enforce strict legal rights, when the other relied on it
- 6. B · She failed, because promissory estoppel is a shield, not a sword
- 7. C · There was no contract, because the terms were too vague
- 8. C · The council breached an implied contract to consider conforming tenders
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.