1.Easy
Under English law, a minor who is supplied with necessaries must pay:
- AOnly if a parent signed the contract
- BA reasonable price for them
- CDouble the contract price
- DNothing, because minors are never bound
2.Easy
A "voidable" contract is one that:
- ACan only be ended by both parties agreeing together to cancel it
- BIs a criminal agreement and illegal
- CIs valid until the affected party chooses to set it aside
- DNever had any legal effect at all
3.Easy
Which English statute allows a third party to enforce a contract term in some cases?
- ALaw Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943
- BContracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
- CUnfair Contract Terms Act 1977
- DMisrepresentation Act 1967
4.Medium
A builder makes a swimming pool shallower than agreed. It is still safe and no less valuable, and rebuilding would cost far more than any benefit. In Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth the owner received:
- AThe full cost of rebuilding the pool
- BA full refund of the contract price
- CNothing, as there was no loss in value
- DA modest sum for loss of amenity
5.Medium
A former wife sues for maintenance her ex-husband promised, relying only on promissory estoppel because she gave no consideration. In Combe v Combe:
- AShe failed, because promissory estoppel is a shield, not a sword
- BShe succeeded, because the promise was made in writing
- CShe failed, because family agreements are never legally binding on either party
- DShe succeeded, because she relied on the promise
6.Medium
A supplier receives a draft agreement, never signs or returns it, but both sides trade on its terms for years. A court is likely to find:
- AA contract accepted by conduct
- BA void agreement for lack of certainty
- CNo contract, because nothing was signed
- DA contract only for the first delivery
7.Hard
Under the EU Unfair Terms Directive, a non-negotiated consumer contract term is unfair if:
- AIt was written in small font
- BContrary to good faith, it causes a significant imbalance to the consumer's detriment
- CThe consumer did not read it
- DIt benefits the trader in any way, even where the consumer's rights are not significantly affected
8.Hard
In Great Peace Shipping v Tsavliris Salvage, the Court of Appeal held that a contract is void for common mistake only if the mistake makes performance:
- ADifferent from the contract in a minor detail
- BImpossible or essentially different from what the parties agreed
- CMore expensive to carry out than both parties had expected when contracting
- DCommercially less attractive for one party
Answer key
- 1. B · A reasonable price for them
- 2. C · Is valid until the affected party chooses to set it aside
- 3. B · Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
- 4. D · A modest sum for loss of amenity
- 5. A · She failed, because promissory estoppel is a shield, not a sword
- 6. A · A contract accepted by conduct
- 7. B · Contrary to good faith, it causes a significant imbalance to the consumer's detriment
- 8. B · Impossible or essentially different from what the parties agreed
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.