1.Easy
Under the UK Consumer Rights Act 2015, the short-term right to reject faulty goods generally lasts:
- A7 days
- B2 years
- C6 months
- D30 days
2.Easy
A counter-offer has which effect on the original offer?
- AIt has no effect at all
- BIt rejects and ends the original offer
- CIt accepts the original offer
- DIt makes the original offer irrevocable
3.Easy
The rule that consideration "must be sufficient but need not be adequate" means:
- AIt must be paid before the contract is made
- BIt must be equal to the market value of the promise it is given in exchange for
- CIt must always be paid in money
- DIt must have some value in law, but need not match the value of the promise
4.Medium
A builder makes a swimming pool shallower than agreed. It is still safe and no less valuable, and rebuilding would cost far more than any benefit. In Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth the owner received:
- AThe full cost of rebuilding the pool
- BA modest sum for loss of amenity
- CA full refund of the contract price
- DNothing, as there was no loss in value
5.Medium
A seller says the farms are "fully let" but does not mention that the tenants have given notice to leave. This is:
- AMere silence, which is never actionable
- BA mere puff with no legal effect
- CA misrepresentation by half-truth
- DA statement of opinion only
6.Medium
A holiday company provides a holiday far below the promised standard. Can the customer recover damages for disappointment?
- AOnly if the company acted dishonestly
- BOnly if the customer suffered a physical injury
- CYes, because the contract's purpose was to provide enjoyment
- DNo, because mental distress is never recoverable in contract
7.Hard
Asked to "telegraph lowest cash price" for a property, the owner replies "Lowest price £900". The enquirer then telegraphs that he accepts. In Harvey v Facey:
- AThere was no contract, because stating a lowest price was not an offer
- BThere was a contract at a reasonable price
- CThere was a contract at £900
- DThe reply was a counter-offer, which the enquirer's telegram then accepted
8.Hard
A council writes that it "may be prepared to sell" a house to a tenant and invites a formal application. The tenant applies, then the council changes its policy. In Gibson v Manchester City Council, the House of Lords held:
- AA contract was formed when the council's letter was sent to the tenant
- BThere was no contract, because the letter was not an offer
- CThe council was bound by estoppel to sell
- DA contract was formed when the tenant applied
Answer key
- 1. D · 30 days
- 2. B · It rejects and ends the original offer
- 3. D · It must have some value in law, but need not match the value of the promise
- 4. B · A modest sum for loss of amenity
- 5. C · A misrepresentation by half-truth
- 6. C · Yes, because the contract's purpose was to provide enjoyment
- 7. A · There was no contract, because stating a lowest price was not an offer
- 8. B · There was no contract, because the letter was not an offer
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.