1.Easy
A term that the parties did not state, but which a court reads into the contract, is:
- AAn express term
- BAn implied term
- CA collateral warranty
- DA condition precedent
2.Easy
A unilateral contract is one in which:
- AOne party promises something in return for the other performing an act
- BOnly one party is allowed to terminate it
- CThe terms are imposed by statute on one party
- DOnly one party signs the written document, so only that party is bound by it
3.Easy
A counter-offer has which effect on the original offer?
- AIt rejects and ends the original offer
- BIt makes the original offer irrevocable
- CIt has no effect at all
- DIt accepts the original offer
4.Medium
A contract made under duress may be:
- AEnforced against the pressured party in every case
- BAvoided (set aside) by the pressured party
- CAutomatically valid with no remedy
- DTurned into a criminal offence only
5.Medium
A buyer is told false figures about a business and is offered documents that would reveal the truth, but does not read them. Under Redgrave v Hurd:
- AThe buyer can still rely on the misrepresentation
- BThe buyer loses all remedies by failing to check
- CThe buyer can claim only half the loss
- DThe misrepresentation becomes a term
6.Medium
A boiler is delivered late to a laundry. The seller knew it was needed for the business but not about especially lucrative dyeing contracts. Under Victoria Laundry v Newman, the laundry recovers:
- AOnly the price it paid for the boiler
- BAll lost profits, including those from the especially lucrative dyeing contracts
- CNothing, because all lost profits are too remote
- DOrdinary lost profits, but not the profits from the special contracts
7.Hard
A van is bought "on hire-purchase terms" with no further detail, and such terms varied widely in practice. In Scammell v Ouston, the House of Lords held:
- AThe seller's usual terms applied
- BThere was a contract on the standard hire-purchase terms of the market
- CThere was a contract at a reasonable price
- DThere was no contract, because the terms were too vague
8.Hard
In Great Peace Shipping v Tsavliris Salvage, the Court of Appeal held that a contract is void for common mistake only if the mistake makes performance:
- AMore expensive to carry out than both parties had expected when contracting
- BDifferent from the contract in a minor detail
- CImpossible or essentially different from what the parties agreed
- DCommercially less attractive for one party
Answer key
- 1. B · An implied term
- 2. A · One party promises something in return for the other performing an act
- 3. A · It rejects and ends the original offer
- 4. B · Avoided (set aside) by the pressured party
- 5. A · The buyer can still rely on the misrepresentation
- 6. D · Ordinary lost profits, but not the profits from the special contracts
- 7. D · There was no contract, because the terms were too vague
- 8. C · Impossible or essentially different from what the parties agreed
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.