1.Easy
Under the UK Consumer Rights Act 2015, the short-term right to reject faulty goods generally lasts:
- A30 days
- B2 years
- C7 days
- D6 months
2.Easy
In English law, "past consideration" is generally:
- ARequired for every contract
- BGood consideration only between family members
- CNot good consideration
- DGood consideration if it was valuable
3.Easy
In England and Wales, a claim for breach of a simple (non-deed) contract must usually be brought within:
- ASix years of the breach
- BThree months of the breach
- CTwelve years of the breach
- DOne year of the breach
4.Medium
Under section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967, a person who made a false statement inducing a contract is liable in damages unless:
- AThe claimant proves that the statement was made fraudulently and not merely carelessly
- BThey prove they had reasonable grounds to believe, and did believe, it was true
- CThe contract was made between two businesses
- DThe statement was made orally and not in writing
5.Medium
A hotel guest sees an exclusion notice in her room only after booking and paying at reception. Under Olley v Marlborough Court Hotel, the notice is:
- APart of the contract, because hotels may exclude liability
- BBinding from the second night onwards
- CNot part of the contract, because it came after formation
- DPart of the contract, because she stayed in the room
6.Medium
A former wife sues for maintenance her ex-husband promised, relying only on promissory estoppel because she gave no consideration. In Combe v Combe:
- AShe succeeded, because the promise was made in writing
- BShe failed, because family agreements are never legally binding on either party
- CShe succeeded, because she relied on the promise
- DShe failed, because promissory estoppel is a shield, not a sword
7.Hard
Two parties agree to continue negotiating for the sale of a business, with no fixed period. In Walford v Miles, the House of Lords held that a bare agreement to negotiate in good faith is:
- AEnforceable, as an implied duty of good faith
- BEnforceable only if made in writing
- CUnenforceable, because it lacks certainty
- DEnforceable as a lock-out agreement
8.Hard
A buyer specifically asks a surveyor to check aircraft noise at a property. The surveyor negligently reports no problem. In Farley v Skinner:
- AOnly the difference in market value was recoverable
- BNo damages were recoverable, because damages for distress or discomfort are always excluded in contract
- CDamages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation
- DThe buyer had to sell the house before claiming
Answer key
- 1. A · 30 days
- 2. C · Not good consideration
- 3. A · Six years of the breach
- 4. B · They prove they had reasonable grounds to believe, and did believe, it was true
- 5. C · Not part of the contract, because it came after formation
- 6. D · She failed, because promissory estoppel is a shield, not a sword
- 7. C · Unenforceable, because it lacks certainty
- 8. C · Damages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.