Criminal law worksheet with answers

Free printable Criminal law worksheet: 8 problems from easy to exam level, with an answer key. Print it or save it as a PDF.

For teachers: free to print, copy and use in class. Every new worksheet has new values and its own answer key. A link to ExamProblems on your course page is appreciated.

Name: ____________________   Date: ____________

1.Easy

The defence of duress requires a threat of:

  1. ADeath or serious injury
  2. BDamage to one's property
  3. CPublic embarrassment
  4. DLosing one's job
2.Easy

In English law, a battery is:

  1. AAny rude remark made in public
  2. BCausing another to apprehend the immediate application of unlawful force
  3. CThe intentional or reckless application of unlawful force to another
  4. DCausing serious injury with a weapon
3.Easy

Under the Criminal Damage Act 1971, criminal damage by fire is charged as:

  1. ABurglary
  2. BAggravated theft
  3. CArson
  4. DAffray
4.Medium

During a burglary, D has handed a knife to an accomplice. When someone arrives, D says "come on, let's go" and climbs out; the accomplice stabs the person. Following R v Becerra, D's withdrawal is:

  1. AIrrelevant, because once an accessory has supplied a weapon, no later act of withdrawal can ever relieve them of liability
  2. BEffective, because D left before the crime was completed
  3. CNot effective, because withdrawal must be timely and unequivocal and may need more than words once violence is imminent
  4. DEffective, because any words of withdrawal are always enough
5.Medium

D points a gun at his friend as a joke, both believing it will not fire. It fires and kills the friend. Following R v Lamb, there was no unlawful act manslaughter because:

  1. AThe death was caused by the gun malfunctioning, not by any act of D's
  2. BThere was no assault, since the friend did not apprehend any force
  3. CJokes cannot be criminal under English law
  4. DThe gun belonged to the friend
6.Medium

D puts poison in V's drink intending to kill her, but V dies of an unrelated heart attack before the poison works. D is guilty of:

  1. ANo offence at all
  2. BManslaughter
  3. CMurder
  4. DAttempted murder
7.Hard

In R v Windle (1952), the court interpreted "wrong" in the M'Naghten Rules to mean:

  1. AWrong according to the defendant's own beliefs
  2. BMorally wrong by society's standards
  3. CLegally wrong
  4. DWrong in the eyes of a doctor
8.Hard

In Re A (Conjoined Twins) (2001), the Court of Appeal allowed surgery that would kill the weaker twin to save the stronger. This is often cited as authority that:

  1. ADoctors can never be liable for murder
  2. BNecessity can, in very exceptional circumstances, justify an act that causes death
  3. CParental consent is a defence to homicide
  4. DNecessity is a general defence to murder whenever more lives would be saved than lost

Answer key

  1. 1. A · Death or serious injury
  2. 2. C · The intentional or reckless application of unlawful force to another
  3. 3. C · Arson
  4. 4. C · Not effective, because withdrawal must be timely and unequivocal and may need more than words once violence is imminent
  5. 5. B · There was no assault, since the friend did not apprehend any force
  6. 6. D · Attempted murder
  7. 7. C · Legally wrong
  8. 8. B · Necessity can, in very exceptional circumstances, justify an act that causes death

Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.