1.Easy
Handling stolen goods (section 22 Theft Act 1968) requires that the defendant:
- AStole the goods personally
- BKnew or believed the goods to be stolen
- CKept the goods for over a month
- DSold the goods for profit
2.Easy
In English law, which court tries the most serious (indictable-only) offences such as murder?
- AThe Court of Appeal
- BThe county court
- CThe magistrates' court
- DThe Crown Court
3.Easy
In English law, "voluntary manslaughter" refers to:
- AA killing with the mens rea for murder where a partial defence applies
- BA killing caused by gross negligence at work
- CA killing caused by an unlawful and dangerous act, without intent to kill
- DA killing that the victim consented to in advance
4.Medium
D, being pursued by armed police, uses V as a human shield and fires at the officers. The police return fire and kill V. Following R v Pagett, D is:
- ANot liable, because V's death was not foreseeable to D
- BLiable, because the police acted reasonably in self-defence and did not break the chain of causation
- CLiable only if the police officers are also convicted
- DNot liable, because the police officers' decision to fire was a free, deliberate and informed intervening act
5.Medium
In English law, the test for dishonesty in theft is now set out in:
- AIvey v Genting Casinos
- BR v Ghosh
- CR v Cunningham
- DDonoghue v Stevenson
6.Medium
Duress as a defence is generally NOT available in English law to a charge of:
- ADrug possession
- BTheft
- CMurder
- DCriminal damage
7.Hard
In R v Dica (2004), D had sex with partners without telling them he was HIV-positive. The Court of Appeal held that:
- AInformed consent to the risk of infection could be a defence to inflicting GBH under s20
- BD was guilty of murder, because HIV can kill
- CConsent is never relevant to the transmission of disease, since s20 protects public health
- DNon-disclosure always makes sex rape under English law
8.Hard
In R v Walkington (1979), D went behind a shop counter and opened a till. This was burglary because:
- AEntering a part of a building as a trespasser is enough
- BThe till contained money at the time
- CD was carrying a weapon at the time
- DShops are treated as dwellings in law
Answer key
- 1. B · Knew or believed the goods to be stolen
- 2. D · The Crown Court
- 3. A · A killing with the mens rea for murder where a partial defence applies
- 4. B · Liable, because the police acted reasonably in self-defence and did not break the chain of causation
- 5. A · Ivey v Genting Casinos
- 6. C · Murder
- 7. A · Informed consent to the risk of infection could be a defence to inflicting GBH under s20
- 8. A · Entering a part of a building as a trespasser is enough
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.