1.Easy
Under Article 258 TFEU, infringement proceedings against a member state are normally started by:
- AThe European Parliament
- BAn individual citizen
- CA national court
- DThe European Commission
2.Easy
Which treaty created the European Union and introduced EU citizenship?
- AThe Treaty of Rome
- BThe Maastricht Treaty
- CThe Single European Act
- DThe Treaty of Amsterdam
3.Easy
The European Ombudsman investigates complaints about:
- ABreaches of EU law by private companies
- BMaladministration by EU institutions and bodies
- CHuman rights violations by member states
- DCrimes committed by EU citizens
4.Medium
In Dillenkofer (1996), the Court held that a complete failure to transpose a directive on time is:
- ANever a ground for state liability
- BIn itself a sufficiently serious breach for state liability
- CExcused if the state was busy with elections
- DSerious only if the Commission has first warned the state in a reasoned opinion
5.Medium
The preliminary reference procedure under Article 267 TFEU allows:
- ANational courts to ask the CJEU questions on the interpretation or validity of EU law
- BThe Parliament to dismiss judges
- CThe Commission to fine member states
- DIndividuals to bring actions against member states directly before the Court of Justice in Luxembourg
6.Medium
The "public service" exception in Article 45(4) TFEU covers:
- AAll jobs in the public sector, including those of nurses, teachers and railway workers employed by the state
- BAny job paid for by public funds
- CPosts involving the exercise of public power and safeguarding the general interests of the state
- DJobs in companies that have government contracts
7.Hard
In Inter-Environnement Wallonie (1997), the Court held that during the transposition period of a directive, member states:
- AMust refrain from adopting measures liable to seriously compromise the result the directive prescribes
- BAre free to adopt any measure until the deadline expires, even one directly contrary to the directive's aims
- CMay ask the Commission to extend the deadline indefinitely
- DMust already apply the directive in full
8.Hard
In Egenberger (2018), the Court held that Article 21 of the Charter (non-discrimination):
- AIs a mere principle that cannot be relied on in court
- BIs sufficient in itself to confer a right that individuals can rely on in disputes between private parties
- CRequires national implementing legislation or secondary EU law before it has any effect in private disputes
- DApplies only to EU institutions and never to private employers
Answer key
- 1. D · The European Commission
- 2. B · The Maastricht Treaty
- 3. B · Maladministration by EU institutions and bodies
- 4. B · In itself a sufficiently serious breach for state liability
- 5. A · National courts to ask the CJEU questions on the interpretation or validity of EU law
- 6. C · Posts involving the exercise of public power and safeguarding the general interests of the state
- 7. A · Must refrain from adopting measures liable to seriously compromise the result the directive prescribes
- 8. B · Is sufficient in itself to confer a right that individuals can rely on in disputes between private parties
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.