1.Easy
The European Ombudsman investigates complaints about:
- ACrimes committed by EU citizens
- BHuman rights violations by member states
- CMaladministration by EU institutions and bodies
- DBreaches of EU law by private companies
2.Easy
Which treaty created the European Union and introduced EU citizenship?
- AThe Single European Act
- BThe Maastricht Treaty
- CThe Treaty of Rome
- DThe Treaty of Amsterdam
3.Easy
Which of these is an exclusive competence of the EU under Article 3 TFEU?
- ATourism
- BThe common commercial policy
- CHealth care organisation
- DEducation and culture
4.Medium
In Ratti (1979), the Court held that an individual could NOT rely on a directive against the state:
- AAfter the transposition deadline had expired
- BIf the directive was clear and unconditional
- CBefore the transposition deadline had expired
- DIf the member state had failed to transpose it
5.Medium
The Bosman judgment (1995) held that football transfer rules for out-of-contract players and nationality quotas:
- AOnly breached competition law, not free movement
- BBreached the free movement of workers
- CWere justified by the need for national teams
- DWere outside EU law because sport is not economic
6.Medium
According to the Dassonville formula, a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction is:
- AAny trading rule capable of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-EU trade
- BOnly a rule that openly discriminates against imported goods in favour of domestic products of the same kind
- COnly a rule that fixes a numerical limit on imports
- DAny tax on goods coming from another member state
7.Hard
In Commission v Italy (trailers, 2009), an Italian ban on motorcycles towing trailers was held to be:
- AA selling arrangement outside Article 34
- BA measure having equivalent effect, because it hindered access to the market for the product
- COutside Article 34 because it applied equally to domestic and imported motorcycles and trailers alike
- DA customs duty contrary to Article 30
8.Hard
In Dano (2014), the Court held that an economically inactive EU national with no sufficient resources:
- ACould be refused social assistance because she did not meet the residence conditions of Directive 2004/38
- BHad to be granted permanent residence after one year
- CHad an absolute right to social assistance on the same terms as nationals, by virtue of Union citizenship alone
- DCould be expelled automatically without any assessment
Answer key
- 1. C · Maladministration by EU institutions and bodies
- 2. B · The Maastricht Treaty
- 3. B · The common commercial policy
- 4. C · Before the transposition deadline had expired
- 5. B · Breached the free movement of workers
- 6. A · Any trading rule capable of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-EU trade
- 7. B · A measure having equivalent effect, because it hindered access to the market for the product
- 8. A · Could be refused social assistance because she did not meet the residence conditions of Directive 2004/38
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.