1.Easy
What is the time limit for bringing an action for annulment under Article 263 TFEU?
- ATwo years
- BTwo months
- CTwo weeks
- DSix months
2.Easy
Which treaty created the European Union and introduced EU citizenship?
- AThe Treaty of Rome
- BThe Single European Act
- CThe Treaty of Amsterdam
- DThe Maastricht Treaty
3.Easy
How many Commissioners are there in the European Commission?
- AOne for every ten million EU inhabitants
- BTwo from each of the larger member states and one from each of the smaller ones
- COne from each member state, including the President and High Representative
- DA number set each year by the European Parliament
4.Medium
In Brasserie du Pêcheur and Factortame III (1996), the Court held that state liability:
- AOnly arises from failure to transpose a directive, not from other acts of the national legislature
- BCan arise from acts of the national legislature, if the breach is sufficiently serious
- CRequires proof that the state acted intentionally
- DNever applies to acts of a national parliament
5.Medium
Article 34 TFEU prohibits:
- ACartels between undertakings
- BDiscrimination based on nationality in employment and the provision of services between member states
- CQuantitative restrictions on imports and measures having equivalent effect between member states
- DState aid to companies
6.Medium
A member state grants a subsidy to a company without notifying the Commission. Under the state aid rules, the state:
- AMust obtain approval from the European Parliament afterwards to legalise the aid
- BBreached the standstill obligation and may be required to recover the aid
- CHas acted lawfully if the subsidy was small in its view
- DMust pay a fine to every competitor
7.Hard
Under the indirect effect principle (Von Colson, Marleasing), national courts must:
- AIgnore national law that conflicts with any directive in private disputes
- BInterpret national law as far as possible in conformity with directives
- CApply directives only after the Commission approves
- DRefer every case to the Court of Justice
8.Hard
In Egenberger (2018), the Court held that Article 21 of the Charter (non-discrimination):
- AApplies only to EU institutions and never to private employers
- BIs a mere principle that cannot be relied on in court
- CIs sufficient in itself to confer a right that individuals can rely on in disputes between private parties
- DRequires national implementing legislation or secondary EU law before it has any effect in private disputes
Answer key
- 1. B · Two months
- 2. D · The Maastricht Treaty
- 3. C · One from each member state, including the President and High Representative
- 4. B · Can arise from acts of the national legislature, if the breach is sufficiently serious
- 5. C · Quantitative restrictions on imports and measures having equivalent effect between member states
- 6. B · Breached the standstill obligation and may be required to recover the aid
- 7. B · Interpret national law as far as possible in conformity with directives
- 8. C · Is sufficient in itself to confer a right that individuals can rely on in disputes between private parties
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.