1.Easy
How is the President of the European Commission chosen?
- AElected directly by EU citizens in a separate vote
- BAppointed by the Court of Justice
- CChosen by the outgoing Commission
- DProposed by the European Council by qualified majority, then elected by the European Parliament
2.Easy
The free movement of capital under Article 63 TFEU applies to movements:
- AOnly between member states, and with third countries only by special agreement
- BOnly to transfers made by governments
- CBetween member states and also between member states and third countries
- DOnly between member states of the euro area
3.Easy
Which TFEU article prohibits restrictions on the freedom to provide services across borders?
- AArticle 56
- BArticle 102
- CArticle 49
- DArticle 30
4.Medium
If a member state does not comply with a Court judgment finding an infringement, under Article 260(2) TFEU the Court can:
- AExpel the state from the EU
- BImpose a lump sum or penalty payment on the state
- CSuspend the state's voting rights in the Council
- DAnnul the conflicting national law itself
5.Medium
In Dillenkofer (1996), the Court held that a complete failure to transpose a directive on time is:
- ASerious only if the Commission has first warned the state in a reasoned opinion
- BIn itself a sufficiently serious breach for state liability
- CNever a ground for state liability
- DExcused if the state was busy with elections
6.Medium
Directives generally do NOT have:
- AVertical direct effect against the state
- BBinding force after the transposition deadline
- CAny legal effect at all
- DHorizontal direct effect between private parties
7.Hard
In Rottmann (2010), Germany withdrew a naturalisation obtained by deception, leaving the person stateless. The Court held:
- AMember states can never withdraw nationality once granted if doing so would make the person stateless
- BThe withdrawal fell within the scope of EU law and had to respect the principle of proportionality
- CNationality is purely national, so EU law is irrelevant
- DThe person automatically regained his previous nationality
8.Hard
In Säger v Dennemeyer (1991), the Court held that Article 56 TFEU requires the abolition of:
- AOnly rules adopted after the provider has arrived
- BAny restriction, even if non-discriminatory, liable to prohibit or impede the services of a provider from another member state
- CAll national licensing requirements, without exception, even where they protect service recipients and are applied proportionately
- DOnly rules that openly discriminate on grounds of nationality
Answer key
- 1. D · Proposed by the European Council by qualified majority, then elected by the European Parliament
- 2. C · Between member states and also between member states and third countries
- 3. A · Article 56
- 4. B · Impose a lump sum or penalty payment on the state
- 5. B · In itself a sufficiently serious breach for state liability
- 6. D · Horizontal direct effect between private parties
- 7. B · The withdrawal fell within the scope of EU law and had to respect the principle of proportionality
- 8. B · Any restriction, even if non-discriminatory, liable to prohibit or impede the services of a provider from another member state
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.