1.Easy
Under Article 258 TFEU, infringement proceedings against a member state are normally started by:
- AAn individual citizen
- BThe European Parliament
- CThe European Commission
- DA national court
2.Easy
The Schengen area mainly concerns:
- AThe election of the European Parliament
- BThe abolition of checks on persons at internal borders
- CThe use of the euro as a single currency
- DThe common rules on competition between companies
3.Easy
Which treaty created the European Union and introduced EU citizenship?
- AThe Maastricht Treaty
- BThe Treaty of Amsterdam
- CThe Treaty of Rome
- DThe Single European Act
4.Medium
In Simmenthal (1978), the Court of Justice held that a national court faced with a national law conflicting with EU law must:
- AApply the national law if it was adopted later
- BAsk the national parliament to amend the law first
- CSet the national law aside of its own motion, without waiting for it to be repealed
- DWait for the national constitutional court to annul the law before it can disapply it
5.Medium
Under Article 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the Charter binds member states:
- AIn all their activities, including purely national matters
- BNever, as it binds only the EU institutions
- COnly when their constitution allows it
- DOnly when they are implementing EU law
6.Medium
Environmental policy is an example of which type of EU competence?
- ASupporting competence
- BShared competence
- CNo EU competence at all
- DExclusive competence
7.Hard
In Åkerberg Fransson (2013), a Swedish fisherman faced tax penalties and criminal proceedings for VAT fraud. The Court held that the Charter applied because:
- AThe Charter applies to every action of a member state, whether or not it involves EU law in any way
- BThe national measures fell within the scope of EU law on VAT and the EU's financial interests
- CThe fisherman was an EU institution employee
- DSweden had incorporated the Charter into its constitution
8.Hard
In Wightman (2018), the Court of Justice held that a member state that has notified its intention to withdraw under Article 50 TEU:
- ACannot revoke the notification under any circumstances
- BCan revoke it only with the unanimous consent of the other member states
- CCan revoke it only after the withdrawal agreement enters into force
- DMay revoke the notification unilaterally, in an unequivocal and unconditional way, before withdrawal takes effect
Answer key
- 1. C · The European Commission
- 2. B · The abolition of checks on persons at internal borders
- 3. A · The Maastricht Treaty
- 4. C · Set the national law aside of its own motion, without waiting for it to be repealed
- 5. D · Only when they are implementing EU law
- 6. B · Shared competence
- 7. B · The national measures fell within the scope of EU law on VAT and the EU's financial interests
- 8. D · May revoke the notification unilaterally, in an unequivocal and unconditional way, before withdrawal takes effect
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.