1.Easy
Which EU court hears most direct actions brought by individuals and companies at first instance?
- AThe Court of Auditors
- BThe General Court
- CThe Court of Justice
- DThe European Court of Human Rights
2.Easy
How is the President of the European Commission chosen?
- AChosen by the outgoing Commission
- BProposed by the European Council by qualified majority, then elected by the European Parliament
- CElected directly by EU citizens in a separate vote
- DAppointed by the Court of Justice
3.Easy
Which treaty article contains the principle of sincere cooperation between the EU and member states?
- AArticle 50 TEU
- BArticle 4(3) TEU
- CArticle 267 TFEU
- DArticle 34 TFEU
4.Medium
The European Parliament can force the whole Commission to resign through:
- AA motion of censure passed by a two-thirds majority of votes cast, representing a majority of MEPs
- BA unanimous decision of the European Council
- CA simple majority vote of the Council
- DA judgment of the Court of Justice
5.Medium
A member state grants a subsidy to a company without notifying the Commission. Under the state aid rules, the state:
- ABreached the standstill obligation and may be required to recover the aid
- BMust obtain approval from the European Parliament afterwards to legalise the aid
- CMust pay a fine to every competitor
- DHas acted lawfully if the subsidy was small in its view
6.Medium
According to Gebhard (1995), what mainly distinguishes establishment from the provision of services?
- AServices are provided only through a permanent office or branch in the host member state
- BEstablishment involves activity on a stable and continuous basis in the host state
- CEstablishment always requires forming a company
- DServices can only be provided by employees
7.Hard
Altmark Trans (2003) set conditions under which compensation for public service obligations:
- ACan only be paid to state-owned companies
- BIs not state aid because it confers no advantage
- CIs always prohibited state aid
- DMust be approved by the European Parliament
8.Hard
In Les Verts v European Parliament (1986), the Court held that acts of the Parliament intended to have legal effects on third parties:
- AAre immune from review because the Parliament is directly elected by the citizens
- BCan only be challenged by member states
- CCan be challenged, because the Community is based on the rule of law
- DAre reviewable only by national constitutional courts
Answer key
- 1. B · The General Court
- 2. B · Proposed by the European Council by qualified majority, then elected by the European Parliament
- 3. B · Article 4(3) TEU
- 4. A · A motion of censure passed by a two-thirds majority of votes cast, representing a majority of MEPs
- 5. A · Breached the standstill obligation and may be required to recover the aid
- 6. B · Establishment involves activity on a stable and continuous basis in the host state
- 7. B · Is not state aid because it confers no advantage
- 8. C · Can be challenged, because the Community is based on the rule of law
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.