1.Easy
Under the Defamation Act 2013, the defence of truth requires the defendant to show that:
- AThe statement was on a matter of public interest
- BThe defendant honestly and reasonably believed the statement was true
- CThe imputation conveyed by the statement is substantially true
- DEvery single word of the statement is accurate
2.Easy
When two tortfeasors cause the same indivisible damage, the claimant can usually:
- ASue only if both are joined in one claim
- BRecover only half from each of them
- CSue only the one who acted first
- DRecover the full damages from either of them
3.Easy
Exemplary (punitive) damages in English tort law aim to:
- ACompensate the claimant's financial loss
- BReflect the claimant's injured feelings
- CReturn any profit the claimant has lost
- DPunish the defendant for outrageous conduct
4.Medium
Auditors negligently certify a company's accounts. An investor relies on them to buy more shares and suffers loss. In Caparo v Dickman, the auditors:
- AWere strictly liable for errors in the accounts
- BOwed no duty to the investor for this purpose
- COwed a duty to anyone relying on the accounts
- DOwed a duty because the investor was a shareholder
5.Medium
A surgeon fails to warn a patient of a small risk of a serious complication. The patient would have had the operation anyway, but later. The risk materialises. In Chester v Afshar, the House of Lords held:
- AThe surgeon was not liable, as the "but for" test failed
- BThe surgeon was liable only for the cost of the operation
- CThe surgeon was liable, modifying normal causation principles
- DThe patient consented, so there was no claim
6.Medium
A five-year-old falls into a trench on open land while playing without an adult. In Phipps v Rochester Corporation, the occupier was:
- ANot liable, because it could expect parents to supervise very young children
- BNot liable, because the child was a trespasser
- CLiable, because young children must be protected from every danger on the land
- DLiable, because the trench was not fenced
7.Hard
For a public authority, a negligence claim about how it exercised a statutory power often fails because:
- AAuthorities are always immune from all claims
- BStatutory powers automatically create a private law duty to use them carefully for each citizen
- CCourts are reluctant to impose duties for failing to confer benefits or for policy decisions
- DThe authority must be sued in a criminal court
8.Hard
A police officer, without arresting her, takes hold of a woman's arm to stop her walking away so she can be questioned. In Collins v Wilcock:
- AThis was lawful, as police may restrain anyone they wish to question
- BThis was a battery, as it went beyond acceptable everyday contact
- CThis was only an assault, as no harm was done
- DThis was lawful, because she was suspected
Answer key
- 1. C · The imputation conveyed by the statement is substantially true
- 2. D · Recover the full damages from either of them
- 3. D · Punish the defendant for outrageous conduct
- 4. B · Owed no duty to the investor for this purpose
- 5. C · The surgeon was liable, modifying normal causation principles
- 6. A · Not liable, because it could expect parents to supervise very young children
- 7. C · Courts are reluctant to impose duties for failing to confer benefits or for policy decisions
- 8. B · This was a battery, as it went beyond acceptable everyday contact
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.