1.Easy
How do English courts usually treat a person injured while rescuing someone endangered by the defendant's negligence?
- AThey can usually claim, because rescue is foreseeable
- BThey can claim only half their damages
- CThey can claim only if they are professional rescuers, such as firefighters
- DThey cannot claim, because they volunteered
2.Easy
Wrongfully dealing with another person's goods in a way that denies their rights, such as selling them, is the tort of:
- AConversion
- BPassing off
- CNuisance
- DBattery
3.Easy
In negligence, the standard of care is usually that of:
- AThe claimant's expectations
- BThe reasonable person in the defendant's position
- CThe defendant's own personal best
- DA perfect expert in every case
4.Medium
A boarding-house warden employed by a school abuses the boys in his care. In Lister v Hesley Hall, the employer was:
- ALiable only for its own negligent hiring
- BNot liable, because the warden acted for himself
- CNot liable, because abuse is never within the course of the warden's employment
- DVicariously liable, because the abuse was closely connected with his duties
5.Medium
A worker inhales silica dust from two sources, only one of which was due to the employer's breach. In Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw, the employer was liable because the guilty dust:
- AMaterially contributed to the disease
- BWas the only cause of the disease
- CWas easier to prevent than the other dust
- DWas more than half of the total dust
6.Medium
A doctor builds a consulting room next to a confectioner whose noisy machines had operated for years without complaint. Can the confectioner defend a nuisance claim by saying the doctor "came to the nuisance"?
- AYes, the doctor accepted the noise by building there
- BNo, coming to the nuisance is not a defence
- CNo, because doctors have special protection
- DYes, because the machines were used first
7.Hard
Under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013, the honest opinion defence requires that the statement:
- AWas a statement of fact, indicated its source, and was shown to be substantially true by the defendant
- BWas published by a professional journalist
- CWas an opinion, indicated its basis, and an honest person could have held it on the facts
- DWas made with no intention to harm
8.Hard
The defence of "illegality" (ex turpi causa) in tort means that:
- AThe defendant cannot be sued if the defendant's own conduct towards the claimant was itself a criminal offence
- BOnly the state can bring the claim
- CEvery claimant with a criminal record loses
- DA claimant may be barred from recovering where the claim arises from their own serious illegal conduct
Answer key
- 1. A · They can usually claim, because rescue is foreseeable
- 2. A · Conversion
- 3. B · The reasonable person in the defendant's position
- 4. D · Vicariously liable, because the abuse was closely connected with his duties
- 5. A · Materially contributed to the disease
- 6. B · No, coming to the nuisance is not a defence
- 7. C · Was an opinion, indicated its basis, and an honest person could have held it on the facts
- 8. D · A claimant may be barred from recovering where the claim arises from their own serious illegal conduct
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.