1.Easy
In English law, publishing private information without justification is mainly dealt with by the tort of:
- ATrespass to land
- BDefamation
- CMisuse of private information
- DMalicious falsehood
2.Easy
Private nuisance concerns:
- AAny loud noise in a public place
- BBreaking a contract with a neighbour
- CDamage to personal reputation
- DUnreasonable interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land
3.Easy
An employer's duty to provide competent staff, safe equipment, a safe place and a safe system of work is:
- AA duty that can be passed to any contractor
- BA non-delegable duty
- CA duty that applies only in factories
- DA duty owed only to managers
4.Medium
A young man dives into a shallow lake in a public park despite warning signs and is paralysed. In Tomlinson v Congleton BC, the council was:
- ANot liable, because the risk was obvious and voluntarily taken
- BLiable, because the signs were ignored by many
- CLiable for half of the damage
- DLiable, because it did not destroy the beach
5.Medium
Under Froom v Butcher, if wearing a seatbelt would have prevented a car passenger's injuries entirely, damages are usually reduced by:
- A10%
- B75%
- C25%
- D50%
6.Medium
The Bolam test applies to:
- AThe standard of care expected of professionals such as doctors
- BOccupiers' liability to trespassers
- CDefamation defences
- DThe remoteness of damage
7.Hard
Under section 4 of the Defamation Act 2013, the public interest defence requires that:
- AThe statement was on a matter of public interest and the defendant reasonably believed publishing it was in the public interest
- BThe statement was on a matter of public interest and the defendant honestly believed that every factual claim it contained was true
- CThe statement was made in Parliament or in court
- DThe statement is shown to be substantially true
8.Hard
In Hedley Byrne v Heller, liability for negligent misstatement arose because:
- AThe statement caused physical injury
- BThe defendant intended to deceive
- CThere was a contract between the parties under which the bank was paid a fee for the reference it gave
- DThere was a special relationship in which the claimant reasonably relied on advice given with skill
Answer key
- 1. C · Misuse of private information
- 2. D · Unreasonable interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land
- 3. B · A non-delegable duty
- 4. A · Not liable, because the risk was obvious and voluntarily taken
- 5. C · 25%
- 6. A · The standard of care expected of professionals such as doctors
- 7. A · The statement was on a matter of public interest and the defendant reasonably believed publishing it was in the public interest
- 8. D · There was a special relationship in which the claimant reasonably relied on advice given with skill
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.