1.Easy
Exemplary (punitive) damages in English tort law aim to:
- ACompensate the claimant's financial loss
- BReflect the claimant's injured feelings
- CReturn any profit the claimant has lost
- DPunish the defendant for outrageous conduct
2.Easy
Under Part I of the UK Consumer Protection Act 1987, liability for a defective product is:
- AFault-based, so the claimant must prove negligence
- BOnly available if there is a contract with the producer of the product
- CLimited to products bought directly from the producer
- DStrict, so the claimant need not prove the producer was at fault
3.Easy
The tort of assault is:
- AHolding someone in a room against their will
- BCausing someone to reasonably expect immediate unlawful force
- CInsulting someone in front of others
- DActually applying force to someone directly and without their consent
4.Medium
A surgeon fails to warn a patient of a small risk of a serious complication. The patient would have had the operation anyway, but later. The risk materialises. In Chester v Afshar, the House of Lords held:
- AThe surgeon was not liable, as the "but for" test failed
- BThe surgeon was liable only for the cost of the operation
- CThe surgeon was liable, modifying normal causation principles
- DThe patient consented, so there was no claim
5.Medium
A driver is in a minor collision, suffers no physical injury, but his chronic fatigue illness becomes permanent. In Page v Smith, he could recover because:
- APsychiatric injury is always recoverable after any road accident, however minor
- BThe defendant intended to injure him
- CHe had a close tie of love with the other driver
- DHe was a primary victim and personal injury of some kind was foreseeable
6.Medium
Under Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, a doctor must inform a patient about:
- AMaterial risks of treatment and reasonable alternatives
- BOnly the risks other doctors would usually mention
- CNothing, unless the patient asks
- DEvery possible risk, however remote
7.Hard
A mother arrives at hospital about two hours after a road accident and sees her family injured and covered in blood. In McLoughlin v O'Brian, she:
- ACould recover only for financial losses
- BCould not recover, as she was not at the scene
- CCould not recover, as she was only told about it
- DCould recover, as she saw the immediate aftermath
8.Hard
Under the EU Product Liability Directive, the "development risks" defence allows a producer to escape liability if:
- AThe consumer did not read the instructions
- BThe product was sold at a low price
- CThe state of scientific and technical knowledge when the product was circulated did not allow the defect to be discovered
- DThe producer was not negligent in manufacturing
Answer key
- 1. D · Punish the defendant for outrageous conduct
- 2. D · Strict, so the claimant need not prove the producer was at fault
- 3. B · Causing someone to reasonably expect immediate unlawful force
- 4. C · The surgeon was liable, modifying normal causation principles
- 5. D · He was a primary victim and personal injury of some kind was foreseeable
- 6. A · Material risks of treatment and reasonable alternatives
- 7. D · Could recover, as she saw the immediate aftermath
- 8. C · The state of scientific and technical knowledge when the product was circulated did not allow the defect to be discovered
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.