Tort law worksheet with answers

Free printable Tort law worksheet: 8 problems from easy to exam level, with an answer key. Print it or save it as a PDF.

For teachers: free to print, copy and use in class. Every new worksheet has new values and its own answer key. A link to ExamProblems on your course page is appreciated.

Name: ____________________   Date: ____________

1.Easy

The phrase "res ipsa loquitur" in negligence means:

  1. AThe claimant has voluntarily accepted the risk
  2. BThe case cannot be decided without expert evidence on the standard of care
  3. CThe defendant is strictly liable for any harm
  4. DThe facts suggest negligence unless the defendant gives an explanation
2.Easy

In negligence, the standard of care is usually that of:

  1. AA perfect expert in every case
  2. BThe claimant's expectations
  3. CThe defendant's own personal best
  4. DThe reasonable person in the defendant's position
3.Easy

In English law, publishing private information without justification is mainly dealt with by the tort of:

  1. ATrespass to land
  2. BMisuse of private information
  3. CMalicious falsehood
  4. DDefamation
4.Medium

Pure economic loss caused by negligent acts is:

  1. ARecoverable only for companies
  2. BRecoverable only where the defendant's conduct was also a criminal offence of some kind
  3. CGenerally not recoverable, with exceptions such as negligent misstatement
  4. DAlways recoverable
5.Medium

In Bolitho v City and Hackney HA, the House of Lords added to the Bolam test that the professional opinion relied on must:

  1. ABe capable of withstanding logical analysis
  2. BBe held by most doctors in the country
  3. CBe accepted by the patient
  4. DBe written in a medical textbook
6.Medium

Under Dutch law, the general provision for liability for unlawful acts (onrechtmatige daad) is:

  1. AArticle 7:17 BW
  2. BArticle 6:162 BW
  3. CArticle 1 of the Constitution
  4. DArticle 3:40 BW
7.Hard

A man's leg is injured by a negligent driver. Later, robbers shoot the same leg and it is amputated. In Baker v Willoughby, the driver:

  1. ARemained liable for the original disability after the shooting
  2. BWas liable only until the shooting
  3. CWas liable for the amputation too
  4. DWas released completely from liability by the robbers' later shooting
8.Hard

After Barker v Corus held that liability under the Fairchild exception was proportionate to each defendant's share of the risk, Parliament responded for mesothelioma cases by:

  1. ARequiring proof of "but for" causation in all cases
  2. BCreating a state compensation fund to replace tort claims against employers and their insurers entirely
  3. CMaking each responsible person liable for the whole damage, under the Compensation Act 2006
  4. DAbolishing claims for asbestos disease

Answer key

  1. 1. D · The facts suggest negligence unless the defendant gives an explanation
  2. 2. D · The reasonable person in the defendant's position
  3. 3. B · Misuse of private information
  4. 4. C · Generally not recoverable, with exceptions such as negligent misstatement
  5. 5. A · Be capable of withstanding logical analysis
  6. 6. B · Article 6:162 BW
  7. 7. A · Remained liable for the original disability after the shooting
  8. 8. C · Making each responsible person liable for the whole damage, under the Compensation Act 2006

Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.