1.Easy
The phrase "res ipsa loquitur" in negligence means:
- AThe defendant is strictly liable for any harm
- BThe claimant has voluntarily accepted the risk
- CThe facts suggest negligence unless the defendant gives an explanation
- DThe case cannot be decided without expert evidence on the standard of care
2.Easy
Donoghue v Stevenson is famous for:
- AEstablishing that manufacturers are liable only to those they contract with
- BEstablishing EU supremacy
- CDefining murder
- DEstablishing the "neighbour principle" for a general duty of care
3.Easy
The tort of assault is:
- AHolding someone in a room against their will
- BCausing someone to reasonably expect immediate unlawful force
- CInsulting someone in front of others
- DActually applying force to someone directly and without their consent
4.Medium
A young man dives into a shallow lake in a public park despite warning signs and is paralysed. In Tomlinson v Congleton BC, the council was:
- ALiable for half of the damage
- BNot liable, because the risk was obvious and voluntarily taken
- CLiable, because the signs were ignored by many
- DLiable, because it did not destroy the beach
5.Medium
Under Froom v Butcher, if wearing a seatbelt would have prevented a car passenger's injuries entirely, damages are usually reduced by:
- A10%
- B75%
- C25%
- D50%
6.Medium
The Caparo test for a new duty of care requires:
- AIntention, motive and damage
- BA contract between the parties, a breach of its terms and loss flowing directly from the breach
- CForeseeability of harm, proximity and that it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty
- DProof of criminal conduct
7.Hard
A mother arrives at hospital about two hours after a road accident and sees her family injured and covered in blood. In McLoughlin v O'Brian, she:
- ACould not recover, as she was only told about it
- BCould not recover, as she was not at the scene
- CCould recover, as she saw the immediate aftermath
- DCould recover only for financial losses
8.Hard
Under the EU Product Liability Directive, the "development risks" defence allows a producer to escape liability if:
- AThe producer was not negligent in manufacturing
- BThe state of scientific and technical knowledge when the product was circulated did not allow the defect to be discovered
- CThe product was sold at a low price
- DThe consumer did not read the instructions
Answer key
- 1. C · The facts suggest negligence unless the defendant gives an explanation
- 2. D · Establishing the "neighbour principle" for a general duty of care
- 3. B · Causing someone to reasonably expect immediate unlawful force
- 4. B · Not liable, because the risk was obvious and voluntarily taken
- 5. C · 25%
- 6. C · Foreseeability of harm, proximity and that it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty
- 7. C · Could recover, as she saw the immediate aftermath
- 8. B · The state of scientific and technical knowledge when the product was circulated did not allow the defect to be discovered
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.