Tort law worksheet with answers

Free printable Tort law worksheet: 8 problems from easy to exam level, with an answer key. Print it or save it as a PDF.

For teachers: free to print, copy and use in class. Every new worksheet has new values and its own answer key. A link to ExamProblems on your course page is appreciated.

Name: ____________________   Date: ____________

1.Easy

In general, a person who hires an independent contractor is:

  1. ALiable only if the contractor has no insurance
  2. BLiable for all torts committed in the same year
  3. CAlways vicariously liable for the contractor's torts
  4. DNot vicariously liable for the contractor's torts
2.Easy

Which three elements must a claimant usually prove in negligence?

  1. AContract, breach and loss
  2. BFault, punishment and apology
  3. CDuty of care, breach of that duty and damage caused by the breach
  4. DIntention, motive and harm
3.Easy

The tort of assault is:

  1. AHolding someone in a room against their will
  2. BCausing someone to reasonably expect immediate unlawful force
  3. CActually applying force to someone directly and without their consent
  4. DInsulting someone in front of others
4.Medium

A driver is in a minor collision, suffers no physical injury, but his chronic fatigue illness becomes permanent. In Page v Smith, he could recover because:

  1. APsychiatric injury is always recoverable after any road accident, however minor
  2. BHe had a close tie of love with the other driver
  3. CHe was a primary victim and personal injury of some kind was foreseeable
  4. DThe defendant intended to injure him
5.Medium

An occupier hires a reputable lift company to maintain a lift. The company's negligence causes an accident. Under Haseldine v Daw, the occupier is:

  1. ANot liable, if it reasonably chose a competent contractor
  2. BLiable only if the lift is new
  3. CLiable for any defect on its premises
  4. DLiable, because maintenance is non-delegable
6.Medium

Under Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, a doctor must inform a patient about:

  1. ANothing, unless the patient asks
  2. BOnly the risks other doctors would usually mention
  3. CEvery possible risk, however remote
  4. DMaterial risks of treatment and reasonable alternatives
7.Hard

A "novus actus interveniens" can:

  1. ATurn a civil claim into a criminal one when the intervening act is an offence
  2. BCreate a new duty of care
  3. CIncrease the damages owed
  4. DBreak the chain of causation between the defendant's breach and the harm
8.Hard

Under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013, the honest opinion defence requires that the statement:

  1. AWas published by a professional journalist
  2. BWas made with no intention to harm
  3. CWas an opinion, indicated its basis, and an honest person could have held it on the facts
  4. DWas a statement of fact, indicated its source, and was shown to be substantially true by the defendant

Answer key

  1. 1. D · Not vicariously liable for the contractor's torts
  2. 2. C · Duty of care, breach of that duty and damage caused by the breach
  3. 3. B · Causing someone to reasonably expect immediate unlawful force
  4. 4. C · He was a primary victim and personal injury of some kind was foreseeable
  5. 5. A · Not liable, if it reasonably chose a competent contractor
  6. 6. D · Material risks of treatment and reasonable alternatives
  7. 7. D · Break the chain of causation between the defendant's breach and the harm
  8. 8. C · Was an opinion, indicated its basis, and an honest person could have held it on the facts

Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.