Introduction to Law: cram pack

An actress agrees to act only for one studio and not for any other during the contract. She leaves to act for a rival. The court is most likely to:

1. AGrant an injunction stopping her acting for the rival
2. BOrder her to perform her contract with the studio
3. COrder her to pay the rival's profits to the court
4. DRefuse any remedy, as personal services are involved

Under the Vienna Sales Convention (CISG), a reply to an offer that adds non-material terms:

1. AHas no legal effect
2. BIs always a rejection
3. CCreates a contract only after a court confirms that the added terms are non-material
4. DIs an acceptance, unless the offeror objects without undue delay

Two chimney sweeps die from fumes while sealing a chimney, despite warnings about the danger. In Roles v Nathan, the occupier was:

1. ANot liable, because specialists can be expected to guard against risks of their trade
2. BLiable, because occupiers must make premises completely safe for every visitor, including specialists
3. CNot liable, because the sweeps were trespassers
4. DLiable, because the warnings were given orally

Police officers arresting a suspect in a busy street knock over an elderly pedestrian. In Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, the Supreme Court held:

1. AA duty arose only because she was a victim of crime
2. BNo duty was owed, as the Caparo test was not met for police operations
3. CNo duty was owed, because the police are immune
4. DA duty was owed, since the police caused harm by a positive act

Which ground of judicial review applies when a decision-maker ignores a relevant consideration?

1. ANone, because courts never review considerations
2. BProcedural impropriety only
3. CLegitimate expectation only
4. DIllegality

In Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke, the Privy Council held that the UK Parliament could still legislate for Southern Rhodesia because:

1. ARhodesia had consented to the legislation
2. BA convention that it would not do so did not limit its legal power
3. CRhodesia had become fully independent
4. DThe convention was legally binding but had been waived by Rhodesia

D makes repeated silent phone calls to V, causing her psychiatric illness. Following R v Ireland, D can be guilty of:

1. AOnly harassment, because no force was used
2. BOnly a civil wrong, because no physical harm occurred
3. CAn assault, as silent calls can cause apprehension of immediate force
4. DNo offence, because words or silence can never amount to an assault in law

In R v Hinks (2000), the House of Lords held that:

1. AReceiving a valid gift can be an appropriation, so it can be theft if dishonest
2. BOnly shop thefts involve appropriation
3. CCivil law always decides criminal liability for theft
4. DA valid gift can never be theft because full ownership passes to the recipient at once

An agreement caught by Article 101(1) TFEU may be exempted under Article 101(3) if, among other conditions, it:

1. AImproves production or distribution and allows consumers a fair share of the benefit
2. BIs notified to and approved by the Commission or the national competition authority in advance
3. CHas been in operation for more than five years
4. DInvolves companies with combined market shares over 50%

In Dano (2014), the Court held that an economically inactive EU national with no sufficient resources:

1. ACould be refused social assistance because she did not meet the residence conditions of Directive 2004/38
2. BCould be expelled automatically without any assessment
3. CHad to be granted permanent residence after one year
4. DHad an absolute right to social assistance on the same terms as nationals, by virtue of Union citizenship alone