Introduction to Law: cram pack

An unusual and onerous term in standard conditions will only be incorporated if:

1. AIt appears on the back of a receipt
2. BIt was fairly and reasonably brought to the other party's attention
3. CThe other party could have found it online
4. DIt is printed anywhere in the contract documents, however small the type

A buyer purchases oats thinking they are old oats. The seller knows they are new, but made no statement or promise that they were old. Under Smith v Hughes:

1. AThe contract is void for unilateral mistake
2. BThe contract is voidable, because the seller's silence amounted to a misrepresentation
3. CThe seller had a duty to correct the buyer
4. DThe contract is binding, because a mistake about quality alone is not enough

Under Froom v Butcher, if wearing a seatbelt would have prevented a car passenger's injuries entirely, damages are usually reduced by:

1. A25%
2. B10%
3. C75%
4. D50%

A petrol station kiosk attendant racially abuses a customer, follows him outside and assaults him. In Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets, the employer was:

1. ANot liable, because the assault took place outside the kiosk and after the conversation ended
2. BLiable only if it had trained him poorly
3. CNot liable, because violence was not part of his job
4. DVicariously liable, as the assault was closely connected to his job of serving customers

Which rights in the ECHR are absolute and allow no derogation even in an emergency?

1. AThe prohibition of torture (Article 3)
2. BRight to respect for private life (Article 8)
3. CFreedom of assembly (Article 11)
4. DFreedom of expression (Article 10)

The "margin of appreciation" doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights means that:

1. AStates may disregard Strasbourg judgments whenever their own parliament disagrees with the outcome
2. BEvery state must apply identical rules
3. CStates have some discretion in how they protect rights, especially on sensitive moral issues
4. DThe Court never reviews national decisions

In English law, the mens rea of murder is:

1. ASubjective recklessness as to causing death or serious harm
2. BIntention to frighten the victim
3. CNegligence in causing death
4. DIntention to kill or to cause grievous bodily harm

Which of these is NOT a qualifying trigger for the loss of control defence under section 55 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009?

1. ASexual infidelity, considered on its own
2. BA fear of serious violence from the victim
3. CA combination of fear of violence and grave provocation
4. DThings said or done of an extremely grave character

The Cassis de Dijon judgment introduced:

1. AThe rule that indistinctly applicable measures can be justified only on the grounds listed exhaustively in Article 36 TFEU
2. BState liability
3. CMutual recognition and mandatory requirements as justifications for indistinctly applicable measures
4. DEU citizenship

In Plaumann (1963), a clementine importer challenged a Commission decision addressed to Germany. The Court held that a non-addressee is individually concerned only if:

1. AThe act affects them because of attributes or circumstances that distinguish them from all other persons
2. BThey have written to the Commission before the act
3. CThey suffer a financial loss from the act
4. DThey belong to the economic sector affected and carry on the commercial activity that the act regulates, like any other importer