Introduction to Law: cram pack

Formula sheets, the key method steps for every topic and 10 practice problems, with full solutions at the back.

New problemsBack to the course

In the print window, choose “Save as PDF” to keep a copy on your device.

1Practice problems

1.Contract lawMedium

Under section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967, a person who made a false statement inducing a contract is liable in damages unless:

  1. AThe statement was made orally and not in writing
  2. BThey prove they had reasonable grounds to believe, and did believe, it was true
  3. CThe claimant proves that the statement was made fraudulently and not merely carelessly
  4. DThe contract was made between two businesses
2.Contract lawHard

Specific performance is usually ordered when:

  1. AThe defendant has no money
  2. BDamages would be an inadequate remedy, for example for unique goods or land
  3. CThe contract involves personal services, such as employment or performance contracts
  4. DThe claimant asks for it in any case
3.Tort lawMedium

The Caparo test for a new duty of care requires:

  1. AIntention, motive and damage
  2. BProof of criminal conduct
  3. CA contract between the parties, a breach of its terms and loss flowing directly from the breach
  4. DForeseeability of harm, proximity and that it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty
4.Tort lawHard

A newspaper publishes that a model is attending Narcotics Anonymous, with details and photographs of her leaving a meeting. In Campbell v MGN, the House of Lords held:

  1. AOnly the fact of her addiction was private
  2. BThere was no claim, because she had lied about drug use
  3. CThere was no claim, because the photographs were taken on a public street in London
  4. DPublishing the details and photographs was a misuse of private information
5.Constitutional lawMedium

Under the UK Human Rights Act 1998, if a court cannot read an Act compatibly with Convention rights, it can:

  1. ARefer the case to the European Court of Human Rights automatically
  2. BMake a declaration of incompatibility, leaving the Act in force
  3. COrder Parliament to amend the Act within a month
  4. DStrike down the Act immediately
6.Constitutional lawHard

After 2001, the UK detained foreign terrorism suspects indefinitely without trial. In A v Home Secretary (the Belmarsh case), the House of Lords:

  1. AUpheld the detention as a valid response to an emergency
  2. BMade a declaration of incompatibility, finding the measure disproportionate and discriminatory
  3. CHeld that national security questions were for the executive alone and could not be reviewed by courts
  4. DOrdered the immediate release of all detainees
7.Criminal lawMedium

The "thin skull" rule in criminal law means:

  1. AOnly healthy victims are protected
  2. BA frail victim breaks the chain of causation
  3. CThe victim's injuries must be foreseeable in extent
  4. DThe defendant must take the victim as they find them
8.Criminal lawHard

Why is the principle of "lex certa" important in criminal law?

  1. ALaws must be certain to be enforced, so the police have no discretion in applying them
  2. BCriminal laws must be clear enough for people to foresee what is punishable
  3. CJudges must be certain before sentencing
  4. DOnly certain crimes can be prosecuted
9.EU lawMedium

A member state taxes imported whisky more heavily than a similar domestic spirit. Which provision is most directly breached?

  1. AArticle 30 TFEU on customs duties and charges having equivalent effect
  2. BArticle 110 TFEU on discriminatory internal taxation
  3. CArticle 101 TFEU on cartels
  4. DArticle 45 TFEU on workers
10.EU lawHard

In Faccini Dori (1994), a consumer tried to rely on an untransposed consumer directive against a private company. The Court held that:

  1. AThe directive was invalid because it had not been transposed
  2. BDirectives cannot of themselves impose obligations on individuals, so she could not rely on it
  3. CThe company was an emanation of the state
  4. DThe directive had horizontal direct effect, because consumers are the weaker contracting parties

2Solutions

1.Contract law

Answer: B · They prove they had reasonable grounds to believe, and did believe, it was true

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Section 2(1) reverses the burden of proof, so the claimant does not need to prove negligence. Damages are assessed as if for fraud (Royscot Trust v Rogerson).

Answer

B · They prove they had reasonable grounds to believe, and did believe, it was true
2.Contract law

Answer: B · Damages would be an inadequate remedy, for example for unique goods or land

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Common law courts order specific performance where damages are inadequate, such as sales of land or unique items, but not for personal service contracts. Civil law systems treat performance as a more primary remedy.

Answer

B · Damages would be an inadequate remedy, for example for unique goods or land
3.Tort law

Answer: D · Foreseeability of harm, proximity and that it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Caparo v Dickman set out foreseeability, proximity and fairness; courts now develop duties incrementally by analogy with existing cases.

Answer

D · Foreseeability of harm, proximity and that it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty
4.Tort law

Answer: D · Publishing the details and photographs was a misuse of private information

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The paper could reveal she had lied about drug use, but the details of her treatment and the photographs went further. Balancing Articles 8 and 10, her privacy prevailed.

Answer

D · Publishing the details and photographs was a misuse of private information
5.Constitutional law

Answer: B · Make a declaration of incompatibility, leaving the Act in force

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Courts must interpret legislation compatibly where possible (section 3). Otherwise higher courts may issue a declaration of incompatibility (section 4), but the Act remains valid.

Answer

B · Make a declaration of incompatibility, leaving the Act in force
6.Constitutional law

Answer: B · Made a declaration of incompatibility, finding the measure disproportionate and discriminatory

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The Lords quashed the derogation order and declared the detention power incompatible with Articles 5 and 14, because it applied only to foreign nationals and was not strictly required by the emergency.

Answer

B · Made a declaration of incompatibility, finding the measure disproportionate and discriminatory
7.Criminal law

Answer: D · The defendant must take the victim as they find them

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. A defendant is liable for the full consequences even if the victim's characteristics (physical or beliefs) made them worse than expected.

Answer

D · The defendant must take the victim as they find them
8.Criminal law

Answer: B · Criminal laws must be clear enough for people to foresee what is punishable

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: general principle, found in most legal systems. Criminal provisions must be sufficiently precise and accessible; vague laws violate legal certainty and the legality principle.

Answer

B · Criminal laws must be clear enough for people to foresee what is punishable
9.EU law

Answer: B · Article 110 TFEU on discriminatory internal taxation

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. Article 110 prohibits internal taxes that discriminate against similar products from other member states or protect competing domestic products.

Answer

B · Article 110 TFEU on discriminatory internal taxation
10.EU law

Answer: B · Directives cannot of themselves impose obligations on individuals, so she could not rely on it

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. The Court confirmed Marshall: no horizontal direct effect of directives, but national courts must interpret national law consistently and the state may be liable in damages.

Answer

B · Directives cannot of themselves impose obligations on individuals, so she could not rely on it

ExamProblems · examproblems.com/courses/introduction-to-law