Introduction to Law: cram pack

Formula sheets, the key method steps for every topic and 10 practice problems, with full solutions at the back.

New problemsBack to the course

In the print window, choose “Save as PDF” to keep a copy on your device.

1Practice problems

1.Contract lawMedium

In English law, the "postal rule" means an acceptance sent by post takes effect:

  1. AWhen the letter is posted
  2. BWhen the letter is read
  3. CWhen the letter arrives
  4. DWhen the offeror replies
2.Contract lawHard

A buyer specifically asks a surveyor to check aircraft noise at a property. The surveyor negligently reports no problem. In Farley v Skinner:

  1. AThe buyer had to sell the house before claiming
  2. BDamages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation
  3. COnly the difference in market value was recoverable
  4. DNo damages were recoverable, because damages for distress or discomfort are always excluded in contract
3.Tort lawMedium

A house is built on defective foundations, approved by the local authority. Cracks appear and the owner sells at a loss. In Murphy v Brentwood DC, the loss was:

  1. APure economic loss, not recoverable in negligence
  2. BPhysical damage, fully recoverable
  3. CRecoverable only against the buyer
  4. DRecoverable because the council approved the plans
4.Tort lawHard

Residents complain of noise from a motor sports stadium that had been used for years and had planning permission. In Coventry v Lawrence, the Supreme Court held that:

  1. APlanning permission was not in itself a defence, and damages instead of an injunction should be considered more flexibly
  2. BPlanning permission was a complete defence to the nuisance claim
  3. CCourts must always grant an injunction where nuisance is proved
  4. DComing to the nuisance was a complete defence
5.Constitutional lawMedium

In England and Wales, a claim for judicial review must generally be filed:

  1. AAt any time
  2. BWithin six years
  3. CWithin one year
  4. DPromptly, and in any event within three months
6.Constitutional lawHard

Under Osman v UK, a state breaches its positive obligation under Article 2 to protect a person from a third party if the authorities:

  1. AFailed to prevent any crime in their area
  2. BKnew or ought to have known of a real and immediate risk to life, and failed to take reasonable measures
  3. CDid not provide round-the-clock police protection for every person who had reported any threat against them
  4. DFailed to convict the person who later killed the victim
7.Criminal lawMedium

D takes V's bag and is seen; a few seconds later D ties V up to escape. Following R v Hale, D is guilty of robbery because:

  1. AAppropriation is a continuing act, so the force was used at the time of the theft
  2. BAny force used on the victim within an hour of the theft automatically turns it into robbery
  3. CTying up a victim is robbery even without theft
  4. DThe bag was later recovered by the police
8.Criminal lawHard

Under the "transferred malice" doctrine, if A aims a blow at B but hits C:

  1. AA is only liable for attempted harm to C
  2. BB becomes liable for the harm to C
  3. CA's intention towards B is transferred, so A can be liable for the harm to C
  4. DA cannot be liable for harm to C because A had no mens rea at all in relation to C
9.EU lawMedium

Which of these can NOT be used to justify a restriction on imports under Article 36 TFEU?

  1. AProtection of human health
  2. BProtection of industrial and commercial property
  3. CProtecting the national economy from competition
  4. DPublic morality
10.EU lawHard

In Commission v Italy (trailers, 2009), an Italian ban on motorcycles towing trailers was held to be:

  1. AA measure having equivalent effect, because it hindered access to the market for the product
  2. BA customs duty contrary to Article 30
  3. COutside Article 34 because it applied equally to domestic and imported motorcycles and trailers alike
  4. DA selling arrangement outside Article 34

2Solutions

1.Contract law

Answer: A · When the letter is posted

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Where post is a reasonable method of acceptance, the acceptance is complete when posted, even if delayed or lost. It does not apply to revocations or instant communications.

Answer

A · When the letter is posted
2.Contract law

Answer: B · Damages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The House of Lords held that non-pecuniary damages are recoverable where a major or important object of the contract, not necessarily the only one, was to provide pleasure or peace of mind.

Answer

B · Damages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation
3.Tort law

Answer: A · Pure economic loss, not recoverable in negligence

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The cost of repairing a defect in a building, or its reduced value, is pure economic loss. The House of Lords overruled Anns v Merton on this point.

Answer

A · Pure economic loss, not recoverable in negligence
4.Tort law

Answer: A · Planning permission was not in itself a defence, and damages instead of an injunction should be considered more flexibly

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The court held that coming to the nuisance and planning permission are generally no defence, though permission may be relevant to locality. It also said the old Shelfer approach to damages in lieu of an injunction should not be applied mechanically.

Answer

A · Planning permission was not in itself a defence, and damages instead of an injunction should be considered more flexibly
5.Constitutional law

Answer: D · Promptly, and in any event within three months

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The short time limit protects good administration and certainty. Some areas, such as planning, have even shorter limits.

Answer

D · Promptly, and in any event within three months
6.Constitutional law

Answer: B · Knew or ought to have known of a real and immediate risk to life, and failed to take reasonable measures

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: European Convention on Human Rights. The obligation is not to prevent every risk, which would place an impossible burden on the police, but to act reasonably once a real and immediate risk is known or should be known.

Answer

B · Knew or ought to have known of a real and immediate risk to life, and failed to take reasonable measures
7.Criminal law

Answer: A · Appropriation is a continuing act, so the force was used at the time of the theft

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Hale held that appropriation can continue while the thief is still in the act of making off, so force used then is "at the time of" stealing.

Answer

A · Appropriation is a continuing act, so the force was used at the time of the theft
8.Criminal law

Answer: C · A's intention towards B is transferred, so A can be liable for the harm to C

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Malice transfers where the actus reus and mens rea are of the same type of offence. It does not transfer between different kinds of offences (R v Pembliton).

Answer

C · A's intention towards B is transferred, so A can be liable for the harm to C
9.EU law

Answer: C · Protecting the national economy from competition

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. Purely economic aims, such as protecting domestic producers, can never justify restrictions on free movement; the listed grounds must also be applied proportionately.

Answer

C · Protecting the national economy from competition
10.EU law

Answer: A · A measure having equivalent effect, because it hindered access to the market for the product

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. The Court held that restrictions on use that prevent or greatly limit demand hinder market access and fall under Article 34, though they may be justified, here by road safety.

Answer

A · A measure having equivalent effect, because it hindered access to the market for the product

ExamProblems · examproblems.com/courses/introduction-to-law