Introduction to Law: cram pack

Formula sheets, the key method steps for every topic and 10 practice problems, with full solutions at the back.

New problemsBack to the course

In the print window, choose “Save as PDF” to keep a copy on your device.

1Practice problems

1.Contract lawMedium

What is an exclusion clause?

  1. AA term that limits or excludes one party's liability
  2. BA clause allowing termination at any time
  3. CA term that excludes a party from paying VAT
  4. DA term that excludes third parties from the contract
2.Contract lawHard

A chartered ship is returned late, and the owner loses a very profitable follow-on charter. In The Achilleas, the House of Lords held the charterer was liable:

  1. AFor no loss, because late return is not a breach
  2. BFor punitive damages, because the delay was deliberate
  3. COnly for the market rate difference during the overrun period
  4. DFor the whole profit lost on the follow-on charter, as it was foreseeable
3.Tort lawMedium

Police officers who helped at the Hillsborough disaster suffered psychiatric injury. In White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire, their claims:

  1. ASucceeded, because rescuers are always treated as primary victims in English law
  2. BFailed, because they were not in physical danger and were not primary victims
  3. CFailed, because the police can never sue their employer
  4. DSucceeded, because they were employees of the defendant
4.Tort lawHard

A bank requires job applicants to have medical examinations by a self-employed doctor, who abuses some of them. In Barclays Bank v Various Claimants (2020), the Supreme Court held the bank:

  1. AVicariously liable, because it chose the doctor
  2. BNot vicariously liable, as the doctor was an independent contractor running his own business
  3. CStrictly liable for any harm to applicants
  4. DVicariously liable, as the relationship was akin to employment and the bank benefited from his work
5.Constitutional lawMedium

In Hirst v UK (No 2), the European Court of Human Rights held that the UK's blanket ban on voting by convicted prisoners:

  1. AWas justified because prisoners have no rights
  2. BViolated the right to freedom of expression in Article 10 of the Convention
  3. CWas within the UK's margin of appreciation
  4. DViolated the right to free elections in Protocol 1, Article 3
6.Constitutional lawHard

Since the 2008 constitutional reform in France, the "question prioritaire de constitutionnalité" allows:

  1. AThe President to suspend a statute for one year
  2. BJudges in any court to strike down statutes themselves
  3. CA party in court to ask for a statute in force to be reviewed for breach of constitutional rights
  4. DAny citizen to challenge a bill before Parliament votes on it, by petition to the Conseil constitutionnel
7.Criminal lawMedium

D and V are playing a properly organised rugby match. D tackles V within the rules and V breaks a leg. D is most likely:

  1. ALiable for battery, because consent is never a defence to serious bodily harm
  2. BLiable, because rugby is not a recognised sport
  3. CNot liable, because players consent to injuries within the rules of the game
  4. DLiable for GBH, because a serious injury was caused
8.Criminal lawHard

Why is the principle of "lex certa" important in criminal law?

  1. ACriminal laws must be clear enough for people to foresee what is punishable
  2. BJudges must be certain before sentencing
  3. COnly certain crimes can be prosecuted
  4. DLaws must be certain to be enforced, so the police have no discretion in applying them
9.EU lawMedium

The European Parliament can force the whole Commission to resign through:

  1. AA judgment of the Court of Justice
  2. BA unanimous decision of the European Council
  3. CA simple majority vote of the Council
  4. DA motion of censure passed by a two-thirds majority of votes cast, representing a majority of MEPs
10.EU lawHard

In the Factortame litigation, the CJEU held that national courts must:

  1. AWait for Parliament to amend the statute first
  2. BApply national statutes until the national parliament itself repeals any rule that conflicts with EU law
  3. CBe able to grant interim relief setting aside a national rule that may breach EU law
  4. DRefer the case to the European Court of Human Rights

2Solutions

1.Contract law

Answer: A · A term that limits or excludes one party's liability

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: general principle, found in most legal systems. Exclusion and limitation clauses restrict liability. They must be incorporated and are controlled by legislation, especially in consumer contracts.

Answer

A · A term that limits or excludes one party's liability
2.Contract law

Answer: C · Only for the market rate difference during the overrun period

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The majority held that the charterer had not assumed responsibility for the loss of an unusually profitable follow-on charter, given the general understanding in the shipping market.

Answer

C · Only for the market rate difference during the overrun period
3.Tort law

Answer: B · Failed, because they were not in physical danger and were not primary victims

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The House of Lords held that employees and rescuers must meet the normal rules. Without being in danger or reasonably believing they were, they were secondary victims and failed the Alcock criteria.

Answer

B · Failed, because they were not in physical danger and were not primary victims
4.Tort law

Answer: B · Not vicariously liable, as the doctor was an independent contractor running his own business

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The court confirmed that vicarious liability does not extend to genuine independent contractors. The doctor had his own practice and other clients, and was not part of the bank's business.

Answer

B · Not vicariously liable, as the doctor was an independent contractor running his own business
5.Constitutional law

Answer: D · Violated the right to free elections in Protocol 1, Article 3

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: European Convention on Human Rights. The Court accepted some restrictions on prisoner voting could be legitimate, but an automatic ban for all convicted prisoners was disproportionate.

Answer

D · Violated the right to free elections in Protocol 1, Article 3
6.Constitutional law

Answer: C · A party in court to ask for a statute in force to be reviewed for breach of constitutional rights

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: French law. Before this reform, the Conseil constitutionnel reviewed laws only before promulgation. Now a question raised in litigation can be referred to it, and it can repeal an unconstitutional provision.

Answer

C · A party in court to ask for a statute in force to be reviewed for breach of constitutional rights
7.Criminal law

Answer: C · Not liable, because players consent to injuries within the rules of the game

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Players impliedly consent to contact within the rules and to risks reasonably incidental to the game; deliberate off-the-ball violence is different (R v Barnes).

Answer

C · Not liable, because players consent to injuries within the rules of the game
8.Criminal law

Answer: A · Criminal laws must be clear enough for people to foresee what is punishable

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: general principle, found in most legal systems. Criminal provisions must be sufficiently precise and accessible; vague laws violate legal certainty and the legality principle.

Answer

A · Criminal laws must be clear enough for people to foresee what is punishable
9.EU law

Answer: D · A motion of censure passed by a two-thirds majority of votes cast, representing a majority of MEPs

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. A censure motion requires a two-thirds majority of votes cast and a majority of the component members; the Commission then resigns as a body.

Answer

D · A motion of censure passed by a two-thirds majority of votes cast, representing a majority of MEPs
10.EU law

Answer: C · Be able to grant interim relief setting aside a national rule that may breach EU law

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. A national rule preventing interim relief against a statute must be set aside where needed to protect rights under EU law, making supremacy effective even against Acts of Parliament.

Answer

C · Be able to grant interim relief setting aside a national rule that may breach EU law

ExamProblems · examproblems.com/courses/introduction-to-law