1Practice problems
1.Contract lawMedium
Damages for breach of contract are generally meant to:
- APut the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been performed
- BReturn both parties only to the position they were in before the contract was made
- CGive the innocent party a profit beyond their loss
- DPunish the party in breach
2.Contract lawHard
A buyer specifically asks a surveyor to check aircraft noise at a property. The surveyor negligently reports no problem. In Farley v Skinner:
- ANo damages were recoverable, because damages for distress or discomfort are always excluded in contract
- BThe buyer had to sell the house before claiming
- COnly the difference in market value was recoverable
- DDamages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation
3.Tort lawMedium
A learner driver on her third lesson crashes and injures her instructor. Under Nettleship v Weston, her driving is judged by the standard of:
- AA professional racing driver
- BHer own best efforts as a beginner
- CA reasonably competent and experienced driver
- DA reasonable learner at the same stage
4.Tort lawHard
After Barker v Corus held that liability under the Fairchild exception was proportionate to each defendant's share of the risk, Parliament responded for mesothelioma cases by:
- AMaking each responsible person liable for the whole damage, under the Compensation Act 2006
- BCreating a state compensation fund to replace tort claims against employers and their insurers entirely
- CRequiring proof of "but for" causation in all cases
- DAbolishing claims for asbestos disease
5.Constitutional lawMedium
In R v Bow Street Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2), the House of Lords set aside its own earlier decision because:
- APinochet had not been given a lawyer of his own choice at the hearing
- BThe judges had made a legal mistake
- CThe case had been heard in private
- DOne judge had links to a charity that was a party to the case
6.Constitutional lawHard
Walter Bagehot described the "efficient secret" of the English constitution as:
- AThe strict separation of all three powers
- BThe independence of the House of Lords
- CThe close union of the executive and legislative powers
- DThe monarch's power to veto legislation
7.Criminal lawMedium
D drinks heavily to gain courage before killing V, as planned. Following A-G for Northern Ireland v Gallagher, D:
- ACan only be guilty of manslaughter
- BCannot rely on intoxication, because the intent to kill was formed before drinking
- CHas a defence of involuntary intoxication
- DCan rely on intoxication because murder is a specific intent offence
8.Criminal lawHard
In R v Larsonneur (1933), a French woman was convicted of being an illegal alien in the UK after being brought there by police against her will. The case illustrates:
- AThe defence of duress of circumstances excusing an involuntary immigration offence
- BTransferred malice from the police to the defendant
- CA state of affairs offence where liability arose without a voluntary act
- DThe requirement of a duty for omissions
9.EU lawMedium
The preliminary reference procedure under Article 267 TFEU allows:
- AThe Parliament to dismiss judges
- BNational courts to ask the CJEU questions on the interpretation or validity of EU law
- CIndividuals to bring actions against member states directly before the Court of Justice in Luxembourg
- DThe Commission to fine member states
10.EU lawHard
In Plaumann (1963), a clementine importer challenged a Commission decision addressed to Germany. The Court held that a non-addressee is individually concerned only if:
- AThe act affects them because of attributes or circumstances that distinguish them from all other persons
- BThey belong to the economic sector affected and carry on the commercial activity that the act regulates, like any other importer
- CThey have written to the Commission before the act
- DThey suffer a financial loss from the act
2Solutions
1.Contract law
Answer: A · Put the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been performed
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: general principle, found in most legal systems. Contract damages usually protect the expectation interest. Punitive damages are generally not awarded for breach of contract.
A · Put the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been performed
2.Contract law
Answer: D · Damages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The House of Lords held that non-pecuniary damages are recoverable where a major or important object of the contract, not necessarily the only one, was to provide pleasure or peace of mind.
D · Damages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation
3.Tort law
Answer: C · A reasonably competent and experienced driver
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The Court of Appeal held that learners must meet the standard of the reasonably competent driver. Inexperience does not lower the standard of care.
C · A reasonably competent and experienced driver
4.Tort law
Answer: A · Making each responsible person liable for the whole damage, under the Compensation Act 2006
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Section 3 makes each defendant in a mesothelioma case jointly and severally liable for the whole damage, with contribution claims between defendants. Barker still applies to other diseases within Fairchild.
A · Making each responsible person liable for the whole damage, under the Compensation Act 2006
5.Constitutional law
Answer: D · One judge had links to a charity that was a party to the case
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Lord Hoffmann was a director of a charity connected with Amnesty International, which had intervened. A judge with such an interest in a party's cause is automatically disqualified.
D · One judge had links to a charity that was a party to the case
6.Constitutional law
Answer: C · The close union of the executive and legislative powers
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Bagehot argued that the Cabinet, drawn from and dependent on Parliament, fused executive and legislature. This contrasts with the US-style separation of powers.
C · The close union of the executive and legislative powers
7.Criminal law
Answer: B · Cannot rely on intoxication, because the intent to kill was formed before drinking
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Where a defendant forms the intent and then gets drunk to carry it out, the intoxication does not negate mens rea and is no defence.
B · Cannot rely on intoxication, because the intent to kill was formed before drinking
8.Criminal law
Answer: C · A state of affairs offence where liability arose without a voluntary act
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Larsonneur and Winzar are criticised examples where courts imposed liability for simply being found in a situation, even though the defendant did not act voluntarily.
C · A state of affairs offence where liability arose without a voluntary act
9.EU law
Answer: B · National courts to ask the CJEU questions on the interpretation or validity of EU law
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: EU law. National courts may (and courts of last instance must, subject to CILFIT exceptions) refer questions to the CJEU, whose answer binds the referring court.
B · National courts to ask the CJEU questions on the interpretation or validity of EU law
10.EU law
Answer: A · The act affects them because of attributes or circumstances that distinguish them from all other persons
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: EU law. Because the importer was affected only as a member of an open class of traders, it was not individually concerned; this strict test still governs non-regulatory acts.
A · The act affects them because of attributes or circumstances that distinguish them from all other persons