Introduction to Law: cram pack

Formula sheets, the key method steps for every topic and 10 practice problems, with full solutions at the back.

New problemsBack to the course

In the print window, choose “Save as PDF” to keep a copy on your device.

1Practice problems

1.Contract lawMedium

Damages for breach of contract are generally meant to:

  1. APut the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been performed
  2. BReturn both parties only to the position they were in before the contract was made
  3. CGive the innocent party a profit beyond their loss
  4. DPunish the party in breach
2.Contract lawHard

A buyer specifically asks a surveyor to check aircraft noise at a property. The surveyor negligently reports no problem. In Farley v Skinner:

  1. ANo damages were recoverable, because damages for distress or discomfort are always excluded in contract
  2. BThe buyer had to sell the house before claiming
  3. COnly the difference in market value was recoverable
  4. DDamages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation
3.Tort lawMedium

A learner driver on her third lesson crashes and injures her instructor. Under Nettleship v Weston, her driving is judged by the standard of:

  1. AA professional racing driver
  2. BHer own best efforts as a beginner
  3. CA reasonably competent and experienced driver
  4. DA reasonable learner at the same stage
4.Tort lawHard

After Barker v Corus held that liability under the Fairchild exception was proportionate to each defendant's share of the risk, Parliament responded for mesothelioma cases by:

  1. AMaking each responsible person liable for the whole damage, under the Compensation Act 2006
  2. BCreating a state compensation fund to replace tort claims against employers and their insurers entirely
  3. CRequiring proof of "but for" causation in all cases
  4. DAbolishing claims for asbestos disease
5.Constitutional lawMedium

In R v Bow Street Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2), the House of Lords set aside its own earlier decision because:

  1. APinochet had not been given a lawyer of his own choice at the hearing
  2. BThe judges had made a legal mistake
  3. CThe case had been heard in private
  4. DOne judge had links to a charity that was a party to the case
6.Constitutional lawHard

Walter Bagehot described the "efficient secret" of the English constitution as:

  1. AThe strict separation of all three powers
  2. BThe independence of the House of Lords
  3. CThe close union of the executive and legislative powers
  4. DThe monarch's power to veto legislation
7.Criminal lawMedium

D drinks heavily to gain courage before killing V, as planned. Following A-G for Northern Ireland v Gallagher, D:

  1. ACan only be guilty of manslaughter
  2. BCannot rely on intoxication, because the intent to kill was formed before drinking
  3. CHas a defence of involuntary intoxication
  4. DCan rely on intoxication because murder is a specific intent offence
8.Criminal lawHard

In R v Larsonneur (1933), a French woman was convicted of being an illegal alien in the UK after being brought there by police against her will. The case illustrates:

  1. AThe defence of duress of circumstances excusing an involuntary immigration offence
  2. BTransferred malice from the police to the defendant
  3. CA state of affairs offence where liability arose without a voluntary act
  4. DThe requirement of a duty for omissions
9.EU lawMedium

The preliminary reference procedure under Article 267 TFEU allows:

  1. AThe Parliament to dismiss judges
  2. BNational courts to ask the CJEU questions on the interpretation or validity of EU law
  3. CIndividuals to bring actions against member states directly before the Court of Justice in Luxembourg
  4. DThe Commission to fine member states
10.EU lawHard

In Plaumann (1963), a clementine importer challenged a Commission decision addressed to Germany. The Court held that a non-addressee is individually concerned only if:

  1. AThe act affects them because of attributes or circumstances that distinguish them from all other persons
  2. BThey belong to the economic sector affected and carry on the commercial activity that the act regulates, like any other importer
  3. CThey have written to the Commission before the act
  4. DThey suffer a financial loss from the act

2Solutions

1.Contract law

Answer: A · Put the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been performed

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: general principle, found in most legal systems. Contract damages usually protect the expectation interest. Punitive damages are generally not awarded for breach of contract.

Answer

A · Put the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been performed
2.Contract law

Answer: D · Damages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The House of Lords held that non-pecuniary damages are recoverable where a major or important object of the contract, not necessarily the only one, was to provide pleasure or peace of mind.

Answer

D · Damages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation
3.Tort law

Answer: C · A reasonably competent and experienced driver

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The Court of Appeal held that learners must meet the standard of the reasonably competent driver. Inexperience does not lower the standard of care.

Answer

C · A reasonably competent and experienced driver
4.Tort law

Answer: A · Making each responsible person liable for the whole damage, under the Compensation Act 2006

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Section 3 makes each defendant in a mesothelioma case jointly and severally liable for the whole damage, with contribution claims between defendants. Barker still applies to other diseases within Fairchild.

Answer

A · Making each responsible person liable for the whole damage, under the Compensation Act 2006
5.Constitutional law

Answer: D · One judge had links to a charity that was a party to the case

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Lord Hoffmann was a director of a charity connected with Amnesty International, which had intervened. A judge with such an interest in a party's cause is automatically disqualified.

Answer

D · One judge had links to a charity that was a party to the case
6.Constitutional law

Answer: C · The close union of the executive and legislative powers

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Bagehot argued that the Cabinet, drawn from and dependent on Parliament, fused executive and legislature. This contrasts with the US-style separation of powers.

Answer

C · The close union of the executive and legislative powers
7.Criminal law

Answer: B · Cannot rely on intoxication, because the intent to kill was formed before drinking

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Where a defendant forms the intent and then gets drunk to carry it out, the intoxication does not negate mens rea and is no defence.

Answer

B · Cannot rely on intoxication, because the intent to kill was formed before drinking
8.Criminal law

Answer: C · A state of affairs offence where liability arose without a voluntary act

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Larsonneur and Winzar are criticised examples where courts imposed liability for simply being found in a situation, even though the defendant did not act voluntarily.

Answer

C · A state of affairs offence where liability arose without a voluntary act
9.EU law

Answer: B · National courts to ask the CJEU questions on the interpretation or validity of EU law

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. National courts may (and courts of last instance must, subject to CILFIT exceptions) refer questions to the CJEU, whose answer binds the referring court.

Answer

B · National courts to ask the CJEU questions on the interpretation or validity of EU law
10.EU law

Answer: A · The act affects them because of attributes or circumstances that distinguish them from all other persons

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. Because the importer was affected only as a member of an open class of traders, it was not individually concerned; this strict test still governs non-regulatory acts.

Answer

A · The act affects them because of attributes or circumstances that distinguish them from all other persons

ExamProblems · examproblems.com/courses/introduction-to-law