Introduction to Law: cram pack

Formula sheets, the key method steps for every topic and 10 practice problems, with full solutions at the back.

New problemsBack to the course

In the print window, choose “Save as PDF” to keep a copy on your device.

1Practice problems

1.Contract lawMedium

At an auction in England, the contract of sale is completed when:

  1. AThe bidder makes the highest bid
  2. BThe auctioneer puts the item up for sale
  3. CThe buyer collects the goods
  4. DThe auctioneer brings down the hammer
2.Contract lawHard

A builder agrees to finish work for an agreed price, then demands more money. The client pays to avoid delay and gets a practical benefit. In English law (Williams v Roffey), the promise to pay more may be:

  1. AEnforceable only if made in writing
  2. BEnforceable, because the practical benefit can be consideration if there is no duress
  3. CUnenforceable, because performing an existing contractual duty can never be good consideration
  4. DA criminal offence
3.Tort lawMedium

A doctor builds a consulting room next to a confectioner whose noisy machines had operated for years without complaint. Can the confectioner defend a nuisance claim by saying the doctor "came to the nuisance"?

  1. ANo, because doctors have special protection
  2. BNo, coming to the nuisance is not a defence
  3. CYes, because the machines were used first
  4. DYes, the doctor accepted the noise by building there
4.Tort lawHard

Under section 4 of the Defamation Act 2013, the public interest defence requires that:

  1. AThe statement was on a matter of public interest and the defendant reasonably believed publishing it was in the public interest
  2. BThe statement was on a matter of public interest and the defendant honestly believed that every factual claim it contained was true
  3. CThe statement is shown to be substantially true
  4. DThe statement was made in Parliament or in court
5.Constitutional lawMedium

In R (Jackson) v Attorney General, the House of Lords held that:

  1. AThe House of Lords could veto any bill permanently
  2. BThe Parliament Act 1949 and the Hunting Act 2004 passed under it were valid
  3. CActs passed under the Parliament Acts were merely invalid delegated legislation
  4. DThe Hunting Act was incompatible with Convention rights
6.Constitutional lawHard

In Ireland v UK (1978), the European Court of Human Rights held that the "five techniques" used in interrogating detainees in Northern Ireland were:

  1. ATorture under Article 3
  2. BInhuman and degrading treatment, but not torture
  3. CLawful because of the emergency
  4. DA breach of Article 5 only
7.Criminal lawMedium

D drinks heavily to gain courage before killing V, as planned. Following A-G for Northern Ireland v Gallagher, D:

  1. ACan only be guilty of manslaughter
  2. BCan rely on intoxication because murder is a specific intent offence
  3. CCannot rely on intoxication, because the intent to kill was formed before drinking
  4. DHas a defence of involuntary intoxication
8.Criminal lawHard

Conspiracy in English law requires:

  1. AA written plan
  2. BThe crime to be actually committed
  3. CAt least one of the conspirators to have carried out an overt act towards committing the agreed crime
  4. DAn agreement between two or more people to commit a crime, with intent that it be carried out
9.EU lawMedium

If a member state does not comply with a Court judgment finding an infringement, under Article 260(2) TFEU the Court can:

  1. AExpel the state from the EU
  2. BSuspend the state's voting rights in the Council
  3. CImpose a lump sum or penalty payment on the state
  4. DAnnul the conflicting national law itself
10.EU lawHard

EU citizenship case law (Zambrano) established that a third-country national parent of a child who is an EU citizen may have a right of residence when:

  1. AThe parent pays a residence fee
  2. BRefusal would deprive the child of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of EU citizenship rights
  3. CThe parent has lived lawfully in the child's member state for at least five years before applying for residence
  4. DThe child is older than 18

2Solutions

1.Contract law

Answer: D · The auctioneer brings down the hammer

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Putting goods up for auction is an invitation to treat, each bid is an offer, and the fall of the hammer is acceptance. A bidder can withdraw a bid until then.

Answer

D · The auctioneer brings down the hammer
2.Contract law

Answer: B · Enforceable, because the practical benefit can be consideration if there is no duress

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Williams v Roffey held that a practical benefit to the promisor can be good consideration for paying more for the same work, provided there is no economic duress.

Answer

B · Enforceable, because the practical benefit can be consideration if there is no duress
3.Tort law

Answer: B · No, coming to the nuisance is not a defence

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. It is no defence that the claimant moved to or built near an existing nuisance. The Supreme Court confirmed this in Coventry v Lawrence.

Answer

B · No, coming to the nuisance is not a defence
4.Tort law

Answer: A · The statement was on a matter of public interest and the defendant reasonably believed publishing it was in the public interest

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Section 4 protects responsible publication on matters of public interest, even if the statement turns out to be untrue. The court considers all the circumstances, with allowance for editorial judgment.

Answer

A · The statement was on a matter of public interest and the defendant reasonably believed publishing it was in the public interest
5.Constitutional law

Answer: B · The Parliament Act 1949 and the Hunting Act 2004 passed under it were valid

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The Lords held that Acts passed using the Parliament Acts are primary legislation. Some judges suggested obiter that there could be limits on parliamentary sovereignty in extreme cases.

Answer

B · The Parliament Act 1949 and the Hunting Act 2004 passed under it were valid
6.Constitutional law

Answer: B · Inhuman and degrading treatment, but not torture

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: European Convention on Human Rights. The Court found a breach of Article 3, but held that the treatment did not reach the special stigma of torture. Article 3 cannot be derogated from in any emergency.

Answer

B · Inhuman and degrading treatment, but not torture
7.Criminal law

Answer: C · Cannot rely on intoxication, because the intent to kill was formed before drinking

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Where a defendant forms the intent and then gets drunk to carry it out, the intoxication does not negate mens rea and is no defence.

Answer

C · Cannot rely on intoxication, because the intent to kill was formed before drinking
8.Criminal law

Answer: D · An agreement between two or more people to commit a crime, with intent that it be carried out

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Under the Criminal Law Act 1977, conspiracy is complete once the agreement is made with the necessary intent, even if no further step is taken.

Answer

D · An agreement between two or more people to commit a crime, with intent that it be carried out
9.EU law

Answer: C · Impose a lump sum or penalty payment on the state

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. On a second referral by the Commission, the Court can impose a lump sum and/or periodic penalty payments; Article 7 TEU, not Article 260, can lead to suspension of voting rights.

Answer

C · Impose a lump sum or penalty payment on the state
10.EU law

Answer: B · Refusal would deprive the child of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of EU citizenship rights

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. Article 20 TFEU precludes measures forcing a child citizen to leave EU territory as a whole, which can give a dependent parent a derived right of residence.

Answer

B · Refusal would deprive the child of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of EU citizenship rights

ExamProblems · examproblems.com/courses/introduction-to-law