Introduction to Law: cram pack

Formula sheets, the key method steps for every topic and 10 practice problems, with full solutions at the back.

New problemsBack to the course

In the print window, choose “Save as PDF” to keep a copy on your device.

1Practice problems

1.Contract lawMedium

Frustration of contract occurs when:

  1. AThe contract was badly drafted
  2. BPerformance becomes more expensive or more difficult than either party expected
  3. CAn unforeseen event makes performance impossible or radically different
  4. DOne party regrets the bargain
2.Contract lawHard

A chartered ship is returned late, and the owner loses a very profitable follow-on charter. In The Achilleas, the House of Lords held the charterer was liable:

  1. AFor no loss, because late return is not a breach
  2. BOnly for the market rate difference during the overrun period
  3. CFor punitive damages, because the delay was deliberate
  4. DFor the whole profit lost on the follow-on charter, as it was foreseeable
3.Tort lawMedium

A man bangs trays and shouts every time his neighbour, a music teacher, gives lessons, purely to annoy her. In Christie v Davey, the court held:

  1. AHis malice made the noise an unreasonable use of land and a nuisance
  2. BOnly the police could deal with the noise
  3. CMusic lessons are themselves a nuisance
  4. DIntention is irrelevant in nuisance, so his motive could not affect the claim
4.Tort lawHard

A surveyor values a modest house for a mortgage lender, knowing the buyer will rely on it. The report is negligent and contains a disclaimer. In Smith v Eric S Bush, the House of Lords held:

  1. AThe lender alone could sue the surveyor
  2. BThe disclaimer excluded all liability to the buyer
  3. CThe surveyor owed a duty to the buyer, and the disclaimer failed the reasonableness test
  4. DThe surveyor owed no duty, because the buyer was not the client who commissioned the report
5.Constitutional lawMedium

In the Factortame litigation, while the UK was an EU member, the House of Lords:

  1. ADisapplied parts of an Act of Parliament that conflicted with EU law
  2. BHeld that EU law could never limit Acts of Parliament
  3. CReferred the matter to the European Court of Human Rights
  4. DDeclared the European Communities Act 1972 invalid
6.Constitutional lawHard

In the Case of Proclamations (1610), the court held that the King:

  1. ACould change any law by proclamation
  2. BCould not create new offences by proclamation
  3. CCould dismiss judges who disagreed
  4. DCould suspend Acts of Parliament
7.Criminal lawMedium

Strict liability offences are offences where:

  1. ANo mens rea is required for at least one element of the actus reus
  2. BOnly intentional acts count
  3. CThe defendant must confess
  4. DLiability arises only if the defendant was negligent as to every element
8.Criminal lawHard

In R v Cunningham (1957), D tore a gas meter off a wall to steal money; gas leaked and poisoned a neighbour. The court held "maliciously" means:

  1. AIntending the harm or foreseeing the risk of it and taking it anyway
  2. BActing with wickedness or ill will towards the victim, as in ordinary usage
  3. CActing in a way that is against the law
  4. DFailing to notice a risk an ordinary person would see
9.EU lawMedium

Under Directive 2004/38, an EU citizen may reside in another member state for up to three months:

  1. AOnly if they prove sufficient resources and comprehensive sickness insurance
  2. BOnly if they register with the police on arrival
  3. COnly if they have a job offer in that state
  4. DWith only a valid identity card or passport and no other conditions
10.EU lawHard

The Kadi judgment (2008) is significant because the CJEU held that:

  1. AUN Security Council resolutions always prevail over EU fundamental rights under the UN Charter
  2. BEU measures implementing UN Security Council resolutions must respect EU fundamental rights
  3. CThe EU has no competence in foreign policy
  4. DIndividuals can never challenge sanctions

2Solutions

1.Contract law

Answer: C · An unforeseen event makes performance impossible or radically different

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Frustration discharges a contract when, without either party's fault, performance becomes impossible or fundamentally different. Mere hardship is not enough.

Answer

C · An unforeseen event makes performance impossible or radically different
2.Contract law

Answer: B · Only for the market rate difference during the overrun period

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The majority held that the charterer had not assumed responsibility for the loss of an unusually profitable follow-on charter, given the general understanding in the shipping market.

Answer

B · Only for the market rate difference during the overrun period
3.Tort law

Answer: A · His malice made the noise an unreasonable use of land and a nuisance

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Deliberate, spiteful conduct can turn what might otherwise be acceptable noise into a nuisance. Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett is a similar case.

Answer

A · His malice made the noise an unreasonable use of land and a nuisance
4.Tort law

Answer: C · The surveyor owed a duty to the buyer, and the disclaimer failed the reasonableness test

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The surveyor knew the buyer would rely on the valuation, which created a duty. Under UCTA, the disclaimer was not fair and reasonable for an ordinary house purchase.

Answer

C · The surveyor owed a duty to the buyer, and the disclaimer failed the reasonableness test
5.Constitutional law

Answer: A · Disapplied parts of an Act of Parliament that conflicted with EU law

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The courts gave priority to directly effective EU law, explaining it as the result of the European Communities Act 1972, which Parliament had voluntarily accepted.

Answer

A · Disapplied parts of an Act of Parliament that conflicted with EU law
6.Constitutional law

Answer: B · Could not create new offences by proclamation

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The King has no prerogative except what the law of the land allows, and cannot change the common law or create new crimes by his own decree.

Answer

B · Could not create new offences by proclamation
7.Criminal law

Answer: A · No mens rea is required for at least one element of the actus reus

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Strict liability offences, often regulatory (food safety, traffic), do not require proof of fault for some element; courts presume mens rea is needed unless Parliament clearly excludes it.

Answer

A · No mens rea is required for at least one element of the actus reus
8.Criminal law

Answer: A · Intending the harm or foreseeing the risk of it and taking it anyway

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Cunningham defined malice as intention or subjective recklessness about the particular kind of harm; D's conviction was quashed because the jury had been misdirected.

Answer

A · Intending the harm or foreseeing the risk of it and taking it anyway
9.EU law

Answer: D · With only a valid identity card or passport and no other conditions

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. For the first three months the only requirement is a valid identity document; longer residence requires being a worker, self-employed, self-sufficient or a student (Article 7).

Answer

D · With only a valid identity card or passport and no other conditions
10.EU law

Answer: B · EU measures implementing UN Security Council resolutions must respect EU fundamental rights

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. The Court reviewed the EU regulation implementing UN sanctions and annulled it for breaching rights of defence and property, asserting the autonomy of the EU legal order.

Answer

B · EU measures implementing UN Security Council resolutions must respect EU fundamental rights

ExamProblems · examproblems.com/courses/introduction-to-law