Introduction to Law: cram pack

A seller says the farms are "fully let" but does not mention that the tenants have given notice to leave. This is:

1. AA misrepresentation by half-truth
2. BA mere puff with no legal effect
3. CMere silence, which is never actionable
4. DA statement of opinion only

In English law, a presumption of undue influence typically arises when:

1. AThere is a relationship of trust and confidence and a transaction that calls for explanation
2. BAny customer signs a contract with a bank
3. CThe price agreed is substantially lower than the market price, whatever the relationship of the parties
4. DAny contract is made between members of a family

Two 15-year-old girls fence with plastic rulers and one is injured in the eye. Under Mullin v Richards, the defendant's conduct is judged by the standard of:

1. AA reasonable teacher
2. BA reasonable 15-year-old
3. CA reasonable adult
4. DThe defendant's own understanding

Members of a religious teaching order abused pupils at schools. The brothers were not employees of the order. In Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society, the Supreme Court held the order:

1. ANot liable, because the brothers were not employees
2. BVicariously liable, as the relationship was akin to employment
3. CNot liable, because the order did not own the schools
4. DLiable only in contract to the schools

Under the Human Rights Act 1998, a private body with some "functions of a public nature" is:

1. ABound by the Act in everything it does
2. BBound by the Act for its public functions, but not for private acts
3. CNever bound by the Act
4. DBound by the Act only if it receives most of its funding from the state

The Wednesbury unreasonableness test asks whether a decision is:

1. ASo unreasonable that no reasonable authority could have made it
2. BSlightly less than ideal
3. CUnpopular with the public
4. DDifferent from what the judge would have decided on the same evidence

D swaps price labels on two items in a supermarket, intending to pay the lower price. Following R v Morris, the appropriation took place when D:

1. APut the item in the trolley
2. BPaid at the checkout
3. CSwitched the labels, assuming one of the owner's rights
4. DLeft the shop without paying

In Re A (Conjoined Twins) (2001), the Court of Appeal allowed surgery that would kill the weaker twin to save the stronger. This is often cited as authority that:

1. AParental consent is a defence to homicide
2. BNecessity is a general defence to murder whenever more lives would be saved than lost
3. CNecessity can, in very exceptional circumstances, justify an act that causes death
4. DDoctors can never be liable for murder

In Van Binsbergen (1974), a Dutch rule requiring legal representatives to reside in the Netherlands was examined. The Court held that:

1. ALegal services are outside the scope of the Treaty
2. BThe freedom to provide services is directly effective and residence requirements need justification
3. COnly regulations can create rights for service providers
4. DMember states may always require residence for professionals involved in the administration of justice

In Åkerberg Fransson (2013), a Swedish fisherman faced tax penalties and criminal proceedings for VAT fraud. The Court held that the Charter applied because:

1. AThe Charter applies to every action of a member state, whether or not it involves EU law in any way
2. BSweden had incorporated the Charter into its constitution
3. CThe national measures fell within the scope of EU law on VAT and the EU's financial interests
4. DThe fisherman was an EU institution employee