1.Easy
Which body adopts laws in a parliamentary democracy?
- AThe legislature (parliament)
- BThe supreme court
- CThe police
- DThe prime minister alone
2.Easy
A constitutional monarchy is one in which the monarch:
- AHolds all legislative and executive power personally, and ministers merely advise on request
- BLeads the governing political party
- CIs head of state but acts within constitutional limits, mostly on ministers' advice
- DIs elected by parliament every five years
3.Easy
Which right is protected by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights?
- ARight to marry
- BFreedom of expression
- CProhibition of torture
- DRight to life
4.Medium
In Hirst v UK (No 2), the European Court of Human Rights held that the UK's blanket ban on voting by convicted prisoners:
- AWas within the UK's margin of appreciation
- BViolated the right to free elections in Protocol 1, Article 3
- CWas justified because prisoners have no rights
- DViolated the right to freedom of expression in Article 10 of the Convention
5.Medium
Constitutional conventions are:
- ANon-legal rules of political practice that are regarded as binding
- BInternational treaties about the constitution
- CMeetings held to write a new constitution
- DWritten rules found in statutes that courts enforce like any other law
6.Medium
Under British Oxygen v Minister of Technology, a public body that adopts a policy for exercising its discretion must:
- AStill be willing to listen to anyone with something new to say
- BHave the policy approved by Parliament
- CMake no policy at all
- DApply the policy rigidly in every case to ensure consistent treatment
7.Hard
In the Harmonisatiewet judgment (1989), the Dutch Supreme Court held that Article 120 of the Constitution:
- AApplies only to delegated legislation
- BWas overridden by the principle of legal certainty
- CPrevents courts from reviewing Acts of Parliament against fundamental principles of law
- DAllows courts to strike down Acts that breach fundamental principles such as legal certainty
8.Hard
In the Case of Proclamations (1610), the court held that the King:
- ACould suspend Acts of Parliament
- BCould dismiss judges who disagreed
- CCould change any law by proclamation
- DCould not create new offences by proclamation
Answer key
- 1. A · The legislature (parliament)
- 2. C · Is head of state but acts within constitutional limits, mostly on ministers' advice
- 3. B · Freedom of expression
- 4. B · Violated the right to free elections in Protocol 1, Article 3
- 5. A · Non-legal rules of political practice that are regarded as binding
- 6. A · Still be willing to listen to anyone with something new to say
- 7. C · Prevents courts from reviewing Acts of Parliament against fundamental principles of law
- 8. D · Could not create new offences by proclamation
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.