1.Easy
Judicial independence means that:
- AJudges decide cases free from pressure from government or other parties
- BJudges cannot be bound by statute
- CJudges are elected by the public
- DJudges may set aside any statute they consider unjust or contrary to good policy
2.Easy
In the UK, after a bill passes both Houses of Parliament, it becomes an Act when it receives:
- AJudicial approval
- BRoyal Assent
- CA referendum vote
- DCabinet confirmation
3.Easy
A federal state is one in which:
- APower is constitutionally divided between a central government and regions
- BRegions may secede unilaterally whenever a majority of their voters wishes
- CAll power is held by the capital city
- DThere is no central government
4.Medium
In R v Bow Street Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2), the House of Lords set aside its own earlier decision because:
- APinochet had not been given a lawyer of his own choice at the hearing
- BThe judges had made a legal mistake
- COne judge had links to a charity that was a party to the case
- DThe case had been heard in private
5.Medium
A minister refuses to refer a complaint to a committee because the result might embarrass the government. In Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, the House of Lords held:
- AThe refusal was lawful, since the Act imposed no duty to give reasons
- BOnly Parliament could question the minister
- CThe refusal was unlawful, as it frustrated the purpose of the Act
- DThe minister had unlimited discretion
6.Medium
Under section 2 of the UK Human Rights Act 1998, UK courts must, when deciding Convention rights questions:
- AFollow every relevant Strasbourg judgment strictly, as binding precedent
- BRefer all questions to Strasbourg
- CIgnore Strasbourg case law
- DTake into account judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
7.Hard
In R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice (2014), concerning the ban on assisted suicide, the majority of the UK Supreme Court:
- AMade a declaration of incompatibility with Article 8, while leaving the ban itself in force for now
- BDeclined to make a declaration of incompatibility at that time, leaving it to Parliament
- CRead the ban down under section 3 to allow assisted dying
- DHeld that Article 8 was not engaged at all
8.Hard
In R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU (2017), the Supreme Court said about the Sewel convention that:
- AIt became legally binding when written into statute
- BIt applies only to Northern Ireland
- CIt requires Scottish consent to the UK's withdrawal from the EU
- DIt is a political convention that courts cannot enforce
Answer key
- 1. A · Judges decide cases free from pressure from government or other parties
- 2. B · Royal Assent
- 3. A · Power is constitutionally divided between a central government and regions
- 4. C · One judge had links to a charity that was a party to the case
- 5. C · The refusal was unlawful, as it frustrated the purpose of the Act
- 6. D · Take into account judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
- 7. B · Declined to make a declaration of incompatibility at that time, leaving it to Parliament
- 8. D · It is a political convention that courts cannot enforce
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.