1.Easy
The Salisbury convention in the UK means that the House of Lords:
- AMay permanently veto bills that alter the constitution of the United Kingdom
- BDoes not block government bills carrying out manifesto commitments
- CElects the Speaker of the House of Commons
- DMust approve all money bills within one week
2.Easy
In a parliamentary system, the government usually depends on:
- AThe approval of the courts
- BThe confidence of parliament
- CA referendum every year
- DThe support of the head of state only
3.Easy
The United Kingdom's constitution is best described as:
- ACopied from the US constitution
- BLargely uncodified
- CSet out entirely in EU treaties
- DFully written in one document
4.Medium
In Lingens v Austria, the European Court of Human Rights held that politicians:
- AMust tolerate wider criticism than private individuals
- BAre fully protected from any criticism
- CHave no rights under Article 10
- DCannot sue for defamation at all
5.Medium
Ellen Street Estates v Minister of Health is cited for the principle that:
- ACourts may refuse to apply a later Act
- BParliament can entrench an Act against later repeal by stating expressly that it may not be amended in future
- CEarlier Acts always prevail over later Acts
- DParliament cannot bind its successors, and a later Act impliedly repeals an inconsistent earlier one
6.Medium
Article 2 of the ECHR (right to life) imposes on states a positive obligation to:
- AGuarantee that no citizen ever dies
- BGuarantee free housing and healthcare to everyone within their territory
- CAbolish all police forces
- DTake appropriate steps to safeguard lives within their jurisdiction
7.Hard
The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 changed the office of Lord Chancellor so that:
- AThe Lord Chancellor gained power to dismiss judges
- BThe Lord Chancellor became President of the Supreme Court and head of the judiciary in England
- CThe Lord Chief Justice, not the Lord Chancellor, is head of the judiciary in England and Wales
- DThe office was abolished completely
8.Hard
In the Urgenda case (2019), the Dutch Supreme Court upheld an order requiring the State to:
- AClose all coal power stations immediately
- BReduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 25% compared with 1990 by the end of 2020
- CWithdraw from international climate agreements
- DPay damages to every Dutch citizen
Answer key
- 1. B · Does not block government bills carrying out manifesto commitments
- 2. B · The confidence of parliament
- 3. B · Largely uncodified
- 4. A · Must tolerate wider criticism than private individuals
- 5. D · Parliament cannot bind its successors, and a later Act impliedly repeals an inconsistent earlier one
- 6. D · Take appropriate steps to safeguard lives within their jurisdiction
- 7. C · The Lord Chief Justice, not the Lord Chancellor, is head of the judiciary in England and Wales
- 8. B · Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 25% compared with 1990 by the end of 2020
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.