1.Easy
The UK convention of collective ministerial responsibility means that:
- AMinisters must publicly support government decisions or resign
- BEach minister can veto Cabinet decisions
- CAll ministers are jointly liable in court for government decisions
- DMinisters are elected together as a group
2.Easy
Members of the Dutch Senate (Eerste Kamer) are mainly elected by:
- AMembers of the House of Representatives
- BDirect vote of all citizens
- CMembers of the provincial councils
- DAppointment by the King
3.Easy
A unitary state is one in which:
- ASovereign power is held at the centre, which may delegate powers to other levels
- BRegions have powers guaranteed by the constitution, which the centre cannot alter alone
- CThere is only one political party
- DThe head of state is also head of government
4.Medium
In the Factortame litigation, while the UK was an EU member, the House of Lords:
- ADeclared the European Communities Act 1972 invalid
- BHeld that EU law could never limit Acts of Parliament
- CDisapplied parts of an Act of Parliament that conflicted with EU law
- DReferred the matter to the European Court of Human Rights
5.Medium
In Thoburn v Sunderland City Council (the "metric martyrs" case), Laws LJ said that "constitutional statutes":
- ACannot be impliedly repealed, only expressly
- BCannot be repealed at all
- CPrevail automatically over all later Acts of Parliament
- DMust be approved by referendum
6.Medium
In Pickin v British Railways Board, the House of Lords held that courts:
- AMust investigate any allegation of fraud in Parliament
- BWill not examine whether Parliament followed its internal procedures in passing an Act
- CCan strike down a private Act if it is shown that Parliament was misled during its passage
- DCan review Acts for compliance with private bill rules
7.Hard
The government tried to stop publication of a former Cabinet minister's diaries. In AG v Jonathan Cape (the Crossman diaries case), the court held that:
- AThe convention of Cabinet secrecy is directly enforceable law, so publication of the diaries had to be restrained
- BMinisters' diaries are always Crown property
- CCabinet discussions could be protected as confidential, but the material was now too old to restrain
- DCourts can never restrain publication of political material
8.Hard
Officers enter a writer's house and seize his papers under a warrant issued by a Secretary of State with no legal authority to issue it. In Entick v Carrington, the court held:
- AThe search was lawful, because the warrant was signed
- BThe search was unlawful, because state action needs legal authority
- CThe search was lawful, because state necessity justified seizing the papers
- DThe writer could only complain to Parliament
Answer key
- 1. A · Ministers must publicly support government decisions or resign
- 2. C · Members of the provincial councils
- 3. A · Sovereign power is held at the centre, which may delegate powers to other levels
- 4. C · Disapplied parts of an Act of Parliament that conflicted with EU law
- 5. A · Cannot be impliedly repealed, only expressly
- 6. B · Will not examine whether Parliament followed its internal procedures in passing an Act
- 7. C · Cabinet discussions could be protected as confidential, but the material was now too old to restrain
- 8. B · The search was unlawful, because state action needs legal authority
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.