1.Easy
Articles 8 to 11 of the ECHR are "qualified" rights. This means that:
- AThey can never be restricted in any way
- BThey can be restricted only during war or a public emergency threatening the life of the nation, under Article 15
- CThey protect only qualified professionals
- DInterferences can be justified if lawful, for a legitimate aim and necessary in a democratic society
2.Easy
A federal state is one in which:
- AThere is no central government
- BAll power is held by the capital city
- CPower is constitutionally divided between a central government and regions
- DRegions may secede unilaterally whenever a majority of their voters wishes
3.Easy
Which body adopts laws in a parliamentary democracy?
- AThe supreme court
- BThe police
- CThe prime minister alone
- DThe legislature (parliament)
4.Medium
In the GCHQ case, the House of Lords held that the exercise of prerogative powers:
- ACan be judicially reviewed, depending on its subject matter
- BCan be reviewed only if Parliament agrees
- CCan never be reviewed by the courts
- DIs always fully reviewable, whatever subject matter it concerns
5.Medium
In Marbury v Madison (1803), the US Supreme Court established:
- AThe power of courts to review the constitutionality of legislation
- BThe right to bear arms
- CThe power of Congress to overrule decisions of the federal judiciary
- DThe President's veto power
6.Medium
Article 2 of the ECHR (right to life) imposes on states a positive obligation to:
- AAbolish all police forces
- BGuarantee that no citizen ever dies
- CGuarantee free housing and healthcare to everyone within their territory
- DTake appropriate steps to safeguard lives within their jurisdiction
7.Hard
Since the 2008 constitutional reform in France, the "question prioritaire de constitutionnalité" allows:
- AJudges in any court to strike down statutes themselves
- BThe President to suspend a statute for one year
- CAny citizen to challenge a bill before Parliament votes on it, by petition to the Conseil constitutionnel
- DA party in court to ask for a statute in force to be reviewed for breach of constitutional rights
8.Hard
A woman with a terminal illness asks for a guarantee that her husband will not be prosecuted for helping her die. In Pretty v UK, the European Court of Human Rights held that Article 2:
- ADoes not include a right to die
- BRequires states to allow assisted suicide
- CWas not engaged by her case at all
- DRequires an immunity for her husband
Answer key
- 1. D · Interferences can be justified if lawful, for a legitimate aim and necessary in a democratic society
- 2. C · Power is constitutionally divided between a central government and regions
- 3. D · The legislature (parliament)
- 4. A · Can be judicially reviewed, depending on its subject matter
- 5. A · The power of courts to review the constitutionality of legislation
- 6. D · Take appropriate steps to safeguard lives within their jurisdiction
- 7. D · A party in court to ask for a statute in force to be reviewed for breach of constitutional rights
- 8. A · Does not include a right to die
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.