1.Easy
In a presidential system, such as that of the United States:
- AThe president is chosen by and from the legislature and must resign if it withdraws its confidence in the government
- BThe head of the executive is elected separately and does not depend on the legislature's confidence
- CThe president is a ceremonial figure with no powers
- DThe president can dissolve the legislature at will
2.Easy
In the UK, the head of government is:
- AThe monarch
- BThe Speaker of the House of Commons
- CThe Lord Chancellor
- DThe Prime Minister
3.Easy
The Sewel convention says that the UK Parliament will not normally:
- AChange taxes without a referendum
- BLegislate on Scottish matters without first holding a referendum in Scotland
- CLegislate on devolved matters without the devolved legislature's consent
- DDebate matters concerning Scotland
4.Medium
In the GCHQ case, the House of Lords held that the exercise of prerogative powers:
- AIs always fully reviewable, whatever subject matter it concerns
- BCan be reviewed only if Parliament agrees
- CCan be judicially reviewed, depending on its subject matter
- DCan never be reviewed by the courts
5.Medium
In Marbury v Madison (1803), the US Supreme Court established:
- AThe President's veto power
- BThe right to bear arms
- CThe power of courts to review the constitutionality of legislation
- DThe power of Congress to overrule decisions of the federal judiciary
6.Medium
In R (Jackson) v Attorney General, the House of Lords held that:
- AThe House of Lords could veto any bill permanently
- BActs passed under the Parliament Acts were merely invalid delegated legislation
- CThe Hunting Act was incompatible with Convention rights
- DThe Parliament Act 1949 and the Hunting Act 2004 passed under it were valid
7.Hard
The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 changed the office of Lord Chancellor so that:
- AThe Lord Chief Justice, not the Lord Chancellor, is head of the judiciary in England and Wales
- BThe Lord Chancellor gained power to dismiss judges
- CThe Lord Chancellor became President of the Supreme Court and head of the judiciary in England
- DThe office was abolished completely
8.Hard
The government introduces high fees for bringing claims to employment tribunals, and the number of claims falls sharply. In R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor (2017), the Supreme Court held:
- AThe fees breached only EU competition law
- BThe fees were lawful because Parliament authorised fees
- CThe fees were lawful because users of the courts must pay for them
- DThe fees were unlawful because they prevented access to justice
Answer key
- 1. B · The head of the executive is elected separately and does not depend on the legislature's confidence
- 2. D · The Prime Minister
- 3. C · Legislate on devolved matters without the devolved legislature's consent
- 4. C · Can be judicially reviewed, depending on its subject matter
- 5. C · The power of courts to review the constitutionality of legislation
- 6. D · The Parliament Act 1949 and the Hunting Act 2004 passed under it were valid
- 7. A · The Lord Chief Justice, not the Lord Chancellor, is head of the judiciary in England and Wales
- 8. D · The fees were unlawful because they prevented access to justice
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.