1.Easy
Under the contra proferentem rule, an ambiguous term is interpreted:
- AIn favour of the party who drafted it
- BAgainst the party who relies on it
- CAs if it were not part of the contract
- DIn favour of the stronger party
2.Easy
The rule that consideration "must be sufficient but need not be adequate" means:
- AIt must be equal to the market value of the promise it is given in exchange for
- BIt must always be paid in money
- CIt must be paid before the contract is made
- DIt must have some value in law, but need not match the value of the promise
3.Easy
An offer with no stated time limit lapses:
- AAt midnight on the day it is made
- BNever, unless revoked
- CAfter a reasonable time
- DAfter exactly seven days
4.Medium
What is an exclusion clause?
- AA term that limits or excludes one party's liability
- BA term that excludes a party from paying VAT
- CA clause allowing termination at any time
- DA term that excludes third parties from the contract
5.Medium
A misrepresentation is:
- AA promise about future behaviour that is not kept, even if honestly made
- BA false statement of fact that induces someone to enter a contract
- CSilence about any fact at all
- DAn opinion that turns out to be wrong
6.Medium
A fishing company receives fewer licences than it needs and chooses to assign them to its other ships, not the chartered one. In Maritime National Fish v Ocean Trawlers the charter was:
- AVoid, because licences were a condition precedent
- BNot frustrated, because the problem was self-induced
- CSuspended until more licences were issued
- DFrustrated by the government licensing decision
7.Hard
Which statement about the parol evidence rule is correct?
- AOral contracts are always invalid
- BEvidence outside a written contract is generally not admitted to add to or vary its terms
- CWritten contracts can never be interpreted
- DCourts must accept any later oral statement as overriding the express written terms of the contract
8.Hard
A former spy publishes his memoirs in breach of his undertaking not to disclose official information. In AG v Blake, the House of Lords:
- AOrdered him to account for his profits, in an exceptional case
- BAwarded only nominal damages
- CAwarded punitive damages to the Crown
- DHeld that no remedy was available
Answer key
- 1. B · Against the party who relies on it
- 2. D · It must have some value in law, but need not match the value of the promise
- 3. C · After a reasonable time
- 4. A · A term that limits or excludes one party's liability
- 5. B · A false statement of fact that induces someone to enter a contract
- 6. B · Not frustrated, because the problem was self-induced
- 7. B · Evidence outside a written contract is generally not admitted to add to or vary its terms
- 8. A · Ordered him to account for his profits, in an exceptional case
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.