1.Easy
Rescission of a contract means:
- ACorrecting the wording of a written contract
- BEnding the contract for the future only and claiming damages for lost profits
- CSetting the contract aside so the parties return to their original positions
- DOrdering a party to perform as promised
2.Easy
Under the contra proferentem rule, an ambiguous term is interpreted:
- AIn favour of the party who drafted it
- BAs if it were not part of the contract
- CIn favour of the stronger party
- DAgainst the party who relies on it
3.Easy
A term that the parties did not state, but which a court reads into the contract, is:
- AA collateral warranty
- BAn express term
- CA condition precedent
- DAn implied term
4.Medium
A customer signs a contract containing an exclusion clause without reading it. Absent fraud or misrepresentation, the clause is generally:
- AIncorporated, because a signature binds the signer
- BVoid for unilateral mistake
- CIncorporated only if it was explained orally
- DNot incorporated, because it was not read
5.Medium
Under the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943, money paid before a frustrating event is generally:
- APaid into court for distribution
- BLost, because the loss must lie where it falls once the contract is frustrated
- CPayable twice, as a penalty
- DRecoverable, though the court may let the payee keep some for expenses
6.Medium
Damages for breach of contract are generally meant to:
- AGive the innocent party a profit beyond their loss
- BPut the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been performed
- CPunish the party in breach
- DReturn both parties only to the position they were in before the contract was made
7.Hard
A chartered ship is returned late, and the owner loses a very profitable follow-on charter. In The Achilleas, the House of Lords held the charterer was liable:
- AFor the whole profit lost on the follow-on charter, as it was foreseeable
- BOnly for the market rate difference during the overrun period
- CFor no loss, because late return is not a breach
- DFor punitive damages, because the delay was deliberate
8.Hard
A buyer specifically asks a surveyor to check aircraft noise at a property. The surveyor negligently reports no problem. In Farley v Skinner:
- AOnly the difference in market value was recoverable
- BThe buyer had to sell the house before claiming
- CDamages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation
- DNo damages were recoverable, because damages for distress or discomfort are always excluded in contract
Answer key
- 1. C · Setting the contract aside so the parties return to their original positions
- 2. D · Against the party who relies on it
- 3. D · An implied term
- 4. A · Incorporated, because a signature binds the signer
- 5. D · Recoverable, though the court may let the payee keep some for expenses
- 6. B · Put the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been performed
- 7. B · Only for the market rate difference during the overrun period
- 8. C · Damages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.